![Reply](STYLES/Planetarion2/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
5 Apr 2014, 13:04
|
#1
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
R56 development thread.
Seems like this run has kicked off to an interesting start.
Spore is leading comfortably, and got more members than everyone else.
ND/Ultores/CT/FAnG seems to either get the larger chunks of incommings, or seems to have the poorest def.
Im wondering if there are any other alliance willing to take up the fight for the #1 spot atm, or if planet ranks and revenge is what the alliance HCs are looking for this round.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
5 Apr 2014, 18:09
|
#3
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
|
Exactly what im aiming at, the start we have had makes it look like there could be 4 alliances who could be in a good position in 400 ticks, but nothing seems to be happening, no blocks no wars, no nothing
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 04:48
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R56 development thread.
theres always a block vs ult
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 07:17
|
#5
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
theres always a block vs ult
|
lol
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 12:48
|
#6
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Let me rephrase what Blue said:
There is always several alliances cooporating on hitting ult.
There, happy Forest?
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 13:21
|
#7
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R56 development thread.
No
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 14:10
|
#8
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I guess there is no pleasing you, is there?
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 14:53
|
#9
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I find it interesting allies are more interested in "creating" blocks against Ult than hitting one of the top2 tags.
This clearly shows me that ult is being threated unfairly
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 14:56
|
#10
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R56 development thread.
block against ult
lol
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 16:29
|
#11
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
block against ult
lol
|
Thats what blue esper is claiming no?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 16:44
|
#12
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R56 development thread.
doesnt mean he is right
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 16:58
|
#13
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
So either he is lying or he just dont know what blocking against another alliance means.
Can you have incs without being blocked against?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 17:21
|
#14
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R56 development thread.
indeed
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 20:12
|
#15
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R56 development thread.
a) you two could have done this in pm
b) bitcher mentioned blocks first, esper purely made a sarcastic comment about how there always seems to be a block vs ultores every round.
This round is dull. Roid counts are appalling for tick 400. Sadly there is too many gals, and the bottom ones, that supply the easy roids to planet even seem to have 1-2 active guys that annoy the hell out of attackers. BPs need to go back up to 4, galaxies are too much of a lottery now, especially with the exile restrictions. Im all for stifling the ability to create 'super gals' but these changes are the wrong way to go as you have ended up with a lot of decent players locked in cruddy gals and only able to move to cruddy gals because the good gals did there 2 exiles bang on the tick limit.
Actually feel that the extra 5 alliance members has also unbalanced things. Spore has had roughly 10 members more than its rivals for most of the round. Thats 30 extra def slots and attack slots, thats quite a difference.
NOt even HR or ND have managed to fill tag this round. I think that 55-60 is the perfect number for the current playerbase size, anything over and it starts to distort. Think more members should count to tag for it tho. 60 with 55 counting or 55 with 50 counting. Only scanners shouldnt count to tag, crashes have more of an impact then.
|
|
|
6 Apr 2014, 22:15
|
#16
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
a) you two could have done this in pm
b) bitcher mentioned blocks first, esper purely made a sarcastic comment about how there always seems to be a block vs ultores every round.
This round is dull. Roid counts are appalling for tick 400. Sadly there is too many gals, and the bottom ones, that supply the easy roids to planet even seem to have 1-2 active guys that annoy the hell out of attackers. BPs need to go back up to 4, galaxies are too much of a lottery now, especially with the exile restrictions. Im all for stifling the ability to create 'super gals' but these changes are the wrong way to go as you have ended up with a lot of decent players locked in cruddy gals and only able to move to cruddy gals because the good gals did there 2 exiles bang on the tick limit.
Actually feel that the extra 5 alliance members has also unbalanced things. Spore has had roughly 10 members more than its rivals for most of the round. Thats 30 extra def slots and attack slots, thats quite a difference.
NOt even HR or ND have managed to fill tag this round. I think that 55-60 is the perfect number for the current playerbase size, anything over and it starts to distort. Think more members should count to tag for it tho. 60 with 55 counting or 55 with 50 counting. Only scanners shouldnt count to tag, crashes have more of an impact then.
|
I actualy think the exile system seems to be working decent.
If spore is so much better than the rest, why dont people just attack em?
Ofc all the gals are gonna get bashed out of existence if all People do is gal raiding...
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 00:29
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Fear is the answer you seek butcher. Fear that the block that hits ult will hit them instead.
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 00:52
|
#18
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
Fear is the answer you seek butcher. Fear that the block that hits ult will hit them instead.
|
Seems that all the other allies are well satisfied with 2nd indeed.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 07:07
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R56 development thread.
At this point there seems to be no alliance(outside of spore?) with any ambition whatsoever, leading most alliances to just try and farm the smaller alliances and galaxier ad nauseum.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 10:05
|
#20
|
Lovable Ginger
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 52
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
Fear is the answer you seek butcher. Fear that the block that hits ult will hit them instead.
|
oh god ive missed you Blue :P
__________________
r50-51 Astraeus officer
r52-r54 HR Officer
r55 Ultores
r56 HR Officer
r57-58 Black Flag
r59 Astraeus HC / Black Flag
r60 Black Flag
r61 Black Flag officer
r62-67 Black Flag
r68-70 Illuminati HC
r71 FAnG
r72 Black Flag
r73 Ultores
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 12:32
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Well, Faceless & Spore had a mini-war for about 100 ticks and then Howling Rain attacked us for choosing 3 of their planets the night after the Spore war finished, so it's been hectic for us at least.
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
7 Apr 2014, 20:17
|
#22
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReligFree
Well, Faceless & Spore had a mini-war for about 100 ticks and then Howling Rain attacked us for choosing 3 of their planets the night after the Spore war finished, so it's been hectic for us at least.
|
Seems like allies like nd ct hr and rock has had a lot of incommings. Mustve been real quiet for the rest
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 04:05
|
#23
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R56 development thread.
bitcher just want some1 to attack spore...? or im wrong...?
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 04:12
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R56 development thread.
everyone wants to but don't want to be hit back
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 04:16
|
#25
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R56 development thread.
so if u want spore to be attacked, and dont want to be hit back, u come here, and ask some1 to do it for u...
nice move
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 04:21
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Holland
Posts: 22
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Spore is fighting Ultores 1 vs 1. We do not coordinate our attacks with anyone nor have we done so through out the round. This applies to Ultores aswell.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 07:48
|
#27
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSeal
Spore is fighting Ultores 1 vs 1. We do not coordinate our attacks with anyone nor have we done so through out the round. This applies to Ultores aswell.
|
Never lasts. Block wars will happen. Dont take the 1v1 high ground, it will come back to bite you in the ass
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 10:14
|
#28
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph
bitcher just want some1 to attack spore...? or im wrong...?
|
You are very wrong, i do want some more action though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
everyone wants to but don't want to be hit back
|
This is very untrue, everyone would like to hit the top alliance, but not if they are the smallest allie in that Block. Seems like a lot of allies dont want to be "flak" this round, even though they dont know the meaning of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSeal
Spore is fighting Ultores 1 vs 1. We do not coordinate our attacks with anyone nor have we done so through out the round. This applies to Ultores aswell.
|
It seems to me Blue_Esper said that the block that is always against Ult keeps targetting em, why would you say that youve been going 1on1 when their intel are pointing it the opposite direction? 0_o
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 10:22
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
It seems to me Blue_Esper said that the block that is always against Ult keeps targetting em, why would you say that youve been going 1on1 when their intel are pointing it the opposite direction? 0_o
|
Where did he say that?
We are just getting a lot of random incs, that we are horrible and have more leaks than everyone else put together is our own fault
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 12:26
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
This is very untrue, everyone would like to hit the top alliance, but not if they are the smallest allie in that Block. Seems like a lot of allies dont want to be "flak" this round, even though they dont know the meaning of it.
|
umm...thanks for rewording what i wrote?
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 17:46
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I find it rediculous that no block has been formed against Spore
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 20:20
|
#32
|
Just Awesome
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 165
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Well this round surely has developed, from a clear blue sky Newdawn decided to p-target Apprime and have done so for two days in a row.
We are currently considering if this is just random gal raids or an act of war.
Either way - if this is actually p-targetting it appears unprovoked and rather hostile!
|
|
|
8 Apr 2014, 21:57
|
#33
|
Fightin-irish for life
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: guinness brewery
Posts: 2,177
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
a clear blue sky
|
I heard there was very dark Clouds earlier
__________________
Ascendancy, now with added Irish
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it."
-Rommel
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 04:45
|
#34
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
I find it rediculous that no block has been formed against Spore
|
I too, find it ridiculous
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 07:15
|
#35
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Wow, the native englishspeaker lecturing the non-native, what great use of your time. I hear there's a lot of spellingerrors on reddit, why don't you go and correct all them too.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 14:47
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
|
Re: R56 development thread.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 15:48
|
#37
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Less Spelling Nazis and more speculation about who is warring with who please
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 18:49
|
#38
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Rumours of an anti spore block in the forming has been going on the last days. Can Spore survive heavy fire with this rounds stats? Theyve been untested so far
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 21:52
|
#39
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I hear a drunk vikings officer just declared war on his own planet, that should keep them busy for the next few days.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 23:10
|
#40
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I'm sure they have a rule to deal with that.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2014, 23:23
|
#41
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
I'm sure they have a rule to deal with that.
|
I know alliances have their own HCs DCs and BCs but do Vikings have their own QCs after reading the terms and conditions.
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
10 Apr 2014, 03:49
|
#42
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
Wow, the native englishspeaker lecturing the non-native, what great use of your time. I hear there's a lot of spellingerrors on reddit, why don't you go and correct all them too.
|
Aww come on isil
Back on "topic", laughing pretty good at the Vikings coc link. That's a pretty heavy investment of time and thought for a game like this.
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
10 Apr 2014, 20:03
|
#43
|
Fook Yu
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Looked pal
Posts: 383
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
I know alliances have their own HCs DCs and BCs but do Vikings have their own QCs after reading the terms and conditions.
|
The Documents Department is in charge of managing the CoC. This includes continuous improvement of the CoC, as well as maintaing the Google Drive account required to host it. The Documents Department (hereinafter refered to as DD) is lead by a Documents HC. The DD may have several officers (DocCs).
Any change in the CoC must be put forward by the Documents HC for a level 5 vote and requires 60% majority. A level 6 vote can immediately veto against any proposed change to the CoC.
__________________
HEROES - It's not cheating if you admit to it
|
|
|
10 Apr 2014, 22:22
|
#44
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I think it's name pretty much sums it up. A load of CoC!!
Back on topic tho, there is rumours going round that Spore is looking to nap Faceless and Renap Fang in an attempt to not get the brunt of the pending war. Pretty shoddy if you ask me, does Vikings CoC have procedures for when allies act like this, hanging them out to dry. Is there a level 7?
Hopefully FL and Fags say no but both are notorious fencers....
|
|
|
10 Apr 2014, 23:02
|
#45
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Well funnily enough, even though theyve spent a long time on this well written code of conduct for members, Vikings will still fall into its own old ways.
This rounds seems to be more or less over, as the top two alliances have decided to go with a long term agreement, yet again Vikings seems to be happy to be a second tier alliance.
I wonder how long the univers is gonna accept this behavior from Vikings
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 03:00
|
#46
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochese
Back on "topic", laughing pretty good at the Vikings coc link. That's a pretty heavy investment of time and thought for a game like this.
|
i cant stop laughing... my own firm dont have something like that hehe =)
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 06:00
|
#47
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Or BB says something about increase in tag size or something bad about Vikings. Or both.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
12 Apr 2014, 15:56
|
#48
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
I hear a drunk vikings officer just declared war on his own planet, that should keep them busy for the next few days.
|
Wasn't DrunkenViking for sure...
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
12 Apr 2014, 16:50
|
#49
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Emerald Dream
Posts: 116
|
Re: R56 development thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSeal
Spore is fighting Ultores 1 vs 1. We do not coordinate our attacks with anyone nor have we done so through out the round. This applies to Ultores aswell.
|
Its not really called a fight when the other side isnt fighting back. Let me explain.
In one of the first nights of this so called 1 vs 1 fight we had Vikings RANDOMLY raiding a gal with 4 Ultores in it and CT RANDOMLY raiding gals with a few Ultores in. Coordinated or not its what happened.
As if it wasnt enough Spore had 20% more planets(and fleets), 40% more value and 40% more roids than Ultores AT THE START OF THE FIGHT, we had to deal with about 30-35 more RANDOM hostile fleets.
Although we didnt bleed roids in any single night the gap became bigger and bigger to the point where we HAVE to ground all fleets and 3 fleet def to cover incs leaving us unable to fight back with an opponent that RIGHT NOW has double our roids, 50% more value and 20% more fleets.
Maybe it was just bad luck, maybe it was bad strategy or poor planning or maybe Ultores just chose the wrong allies but this is a fight as disproportionate as it can ever be without Spore needing to coordinate their attacks with anyone else.
So yes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSeal
Spore is fighting Ultores 1 vs 1.
|
|
|
|
12 Apr 2014, 19:14
|
#50
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R56 development thread.
I think that Ultores are struggling VS Spore because of their strat. It astonishes me that you picked a strat that is so poor defensively.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:32.
| |