Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
2. No top alliance in their right mind would let you in. Ofc you cant have a clue about top
level alliance workings if you have never been in one.
|
Oh right because I've applied to so many and they've all rejected me amirite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
I think this is exemplified by when you pmed me and told me the way that Destiny could have won was to goto war with vgn and ct from the start and concentrate on fcing their top planets with Bs/cr.
|
Now let's not twist my words. I claimed that the fact that the top 3 alliances spent the majority of the round doing galraids was pathetic and that if there's anything that 1up and eXilition have proven time and time again it is that proactive politics are superior to reactive politics. You then raised the "CT have more Etds and gain way more score than us" to which I replied stating that you should have fleetcaught them. You then attempted to laugh at me for suggesting to fleetcatch BS/CR and I explained that it wasn't too difficult to fleetcatch Etd BS with Fr and their De with Xan Fi.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
3. Claim to fame is an expression used to show why someone was famous/popular for some reason.
|
Yes I got that; I just don't see how I ever used being in SiN as a claim to fame.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
You might study this in your upcoming english GSCE's . Best of luck with them they are a bit trickier than the 11+ exams.
|
You almost made a funny; but due to your ignorance you missed the fact that I did them last summer. I also find it hilariously ironic that you are slating my use of the English language and will gladly point out all of the mistakes in your previous post (which Furball asked you to use a spell checker for as it was quite dire) if you wish.
Just for the record - I got A in both English and English literature, what did you get in your GCSEs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
4. Amycus for one will back me up that you namecheck him and others a hell of a lot just because you talked to them a couple of times in pm or somethin.
|
I've actually never namechecked him. He's just corrected me in PM - I've played in SiN with him at some point; it was the early part of round 13 before he decided to leave as he was unhappy with the politics of the alliance.
Either way I'd also love to see him back you up here with some evidence though.
Love the way you keep accusing me of namechecking people when you've so far namechecked Furball, toot and Amycus (twice).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
5. It shows that you are a bit part player
|
What?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
6. From what i have encountered you have been a laughing stock in any gal you have landed in.
|
Oh right since you know which gal I've landed in each round - please tell me which gals I've been the laughing stock of apart from the Ascendancy gal that kept me for the sheer comedy value of jerome's annoyance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
7. No i mean there are less than 1500 active planets playing. There may be 2k or so signed up but so many are sitting idle in high clusters.
|
Surely it's harder to finish in the top 100 when there are more active planets? Unless you mean something completely different and managed to word your point so badly that I misunderstood it (see what I mean about your incoherent use of the English language?)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
8. eh i think you will find all exilition hc's have finished top 100 at some point.
|
That's beside the point; the HC didn't finish in the top 100 in round 13 ergo they were bad at PA that round. By your own logic this means that they were also shit at politics that round, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
And my point was that not only are you a terrible critic of the game but also a terrible player.
|
Yes because being bad at PA makes you a terrible critic of the game right? Jose Mourinho shouldn't criticise his players for being shit because he was never the best in the world!!
Ad Hominems don't work past the age of 12 Rinoa; now I know you're into pre-pubescent girls and are therefore accustomed to being surrounded by little kids but you've got to adapt when you're arguing with "big boys".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
And yes i have been top 100 back in days when it was a lot harder than now. Just ask any of my old Hc's.
|
Proof?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
and i do believe my proper response when you asked me if Ct's win would be valid was
|
I never asked you if it would be valid. Don't put words in my mouth please.
<Rinoa> we will have #1 planet
<Rinoa> #1 gal and highest average
<Rinoa> thast better than main win in a shit round
Is what you said, I disagreed with this and you then proceeded to question the validity of their win. When I disagreed with that too; you questioned if people would ever take CT seriously.
Also, what you just "pasted" is fake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
But that was my own personal view dont see why u need to bring it up here as if i was out to stir up some CT CANT CLAIM THE WIN crap
|
I brought it up as I found it comical and thought that it would be nice to see the discussion it would generate on the forums.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
So where exactly does one need to have a top planet?
If other alliances choose to put a lot of score into a few planets at the expense of the rest of its members, why should that reflect badly on an alliance that chooses to treat all members equally?
|
Exactly. Rinoa is merely chronically retarded.
Anyway Rinoa; thanks for the entertainment, you've kept me amused for the best part of an hour.
xxx