|
|
12 Jul 2014, 14:33
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 157
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcChas
Using lol waves as an alliance weapon is fine. Needing to set up lol waves to stand a chance of landing is another.
I remember one recent stats-maker justifying a lack of solo attacking options by stating specifically that team-ups were needed in order to land. It is that mindset that I wish to discourage.
|
That is exactly what I was talking about!
It seems our community as a whole has just accepted 5-10 fleet waves as the status quo. The result is everyone thinking these stats are offensive because it's hard to hold roids this round. When it's actually just a lol wave bash fest that is giving that apperance.
I believe the new stats should strive for viable solo roiding fleets. Not every attack should require emp to land.
__________________
BOOM
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 14:43
|
#52
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R58 Stats
You are missing that these stats are viable for solo landing if there is no defence. It is just that you expect defence so you make a teamup to discourage it. Indeed it is partly the offensive nature of this round's stats that has resulted in the rollercoster that is the alliance ranking - particularly the size rankings this round.
Xan can certainly land solo; p3n are doing it a lot at the moment against ND, and ND are slightly less often doing so against p3n.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 15:04
|
#53
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: R58 Stats
Im not sure lolwaves have much to do with stats at all. A lolwave is a totally subjective concept, and i assume the term originates from 'lol thats far more than you need to get trough little me' or words to that effect. Which means that really a lolwave is roughly proportional to the victim's defensive capacity, and if thats the case then the stats are not relevant what looks like an absurd amount of attackers rises or falls as the stats change.
Obviously stats can be offensive or defensive, but ppls psychology is pretty constant, and the idea that splitting the roids 5 ways to get a pretty sure land is for a lot of ppl better than going through a week of not landing because it only needed one or two defenders to stop their one or two man team.
Of course for the defending DC all other things being equal, if they can stop 3 solos on 3 planets with 3 def fleets or one 3 man team on 1 planet, they are gonna stop the solos because its more efficient. This of course is what influences ppl to team in the first place.
(I am ofc aware that some stats require you to team, and that is perhaps not a good thing)
Wanna kill the lol wave; cripple alliances defensive capacity with very small tag sizes!!!
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
Last edited by [B5]Londo; 12 Jul 2014 at 15:33.
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 19:36
|
#54
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R58 Stats
I think Lolwaves are just a cowards way to wage war if the alliance is not willing to put in the time and effort to properly attack someone then they dont deserve to land. Lolwaves just take out the def draws, fake attacks, recall/relaunch. Its as simple as sending out a message 5-6h before launch saying " Launch x y z lt T" and then people prelaunch hours ahead of time and the defender is looking at 5-20 fleets in one tick and will likely go undefended just because the waste of fleets to cover 1 wave.
I think this round really struggled with solos because A/C's were way too high. Xan has an avg A/C of 394 which is VERY high when you consider that they are suppose to be a low armor high damage race. Compare that the D/C of terran which normally is suppose to be sub-par or even Low damage. Average D/C of 368 thats 25 points lower, meaning that terrans cant even target xans a 100% eff. That in itself is a problem.
I want stats that make it each race and each fleet has 1-2 options for solo attacking. However they will always be def options to stop you. And I also want to allow for proper teaming because most people LIKE to play with friends but make it so that you don't need to have these massive 5-10 man waves just to land, one way that you do that is you make attack ships have low armor and high damage. Meaning that they do fire 1st but if they ever get stopped with emp or flack they will take substancial losses.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 20:28
|
#55
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: R58 Stats
The 'launch whole alliance at x y z' scenario was not what I thought you meant by lolwaves at all. I assumed you were talking about big teams on an ordinary planned raid.
If you did mean 5 man teams then you misunderstood me totally; you can make the stats as offensive as you like, you won't end teams unless defence is really so bad it is just not an option and everyone just attacks constantly; otherwise they will simply calculate to attack with enough to outgun 2-3 def fleets in order to get through.
Honestly just go ST; thats about as attack orientated as ppl will accept. Tho unfortunately I never play ST rounds so i guess i won't be coming back as I had thought about doing.
It was a Mad idea anyway!!
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 21:51
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R58 Stats
I use to hate ST stats, then i realized they actually make the game fun, they promote more bReps which everyone likes. Whats the worst kind of round is where you attack every night and you land maybe 1 out of 5 nights and the rest are recalled. If you make some attack ships strong enough to win vs certain races and leave them open to other classes for def its quite effective.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
12 Jul 2014, 22:10
|
#57
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: R58 Stats
Everyone likes to laugh at a crash, in either defence or offence, but if you make stats were defences tend to be costly and attackers will just try their luck unless there is 'loldef' then ppl just give up defending.
U can't make stats to influence ppls psychology is what I've been trying to say all along; if you tilt it to attack you won't get more battles, you just tilt the decision over taking the risk of a land away from the attackers onto alliance DCs. As long as battles have high costs for either side, one side or other will decide to withdraw from it rather than engage. (assuming there is no political reason to take the loss, like damaging an attacking top player, one of my main memories of PA was a bloody defensive battle in r33 in which elviz landed on me at great cost to both me and him, cost us both a lot of ranks, yeah everyone loved the battle report, excerpt anyone who was actually in it!)
U won't convert me to ST stats but i will happily accept that i am in a small minority since i usually play defensively, 2 def fleets one attack day in day out, but the problem with that is you can't afford to be landed on very much cos ur not gonna get em back.
[EDIT]: I seem to have posted somewhat in haste, and misunderstood; clearly you were meaning more battles because with ST the def ships would shoot the attackers without any cost to themselves as a result a small amount of def would still be worthwhile sending, so you mean making attacks more costly (but still worth landing for the roids?) not defence in such cases. my apologies.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
Last edited by [B5]Londo; 12 Jul 2014 at 22:40.
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 00:42
|
#58
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
I use to hate ST stats, then i realized they actually make the game fun, they promote more bReps which everyone likes. Whats the worst kind of round is where you attack every night and you land maybe 1 out of 5 nights and the rest are recalled. If you make some attack ships strong enough to win vs certain races and leave them open to other classes for def its quite effective.
|
I assume its very hard for you to put yourself into the position where you could land an attack where you would loose score in return that your enemy in a war would loose more than you?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 07:50
|
#59
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R58 Stats
I've changed my mind, if I'm supposed to debate stats with the people replying in this thread then I'm out.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 08:19
|
#60
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papadoc
That is exactly what I was talking about!
It seems our community as a whole has just accepted 5-10 fleet waves as the status quo. The result is everyone thinking these stats are offensive because it's hard to hold roids this round. When it's actually just a lol wave bash fest that is giving that apperance.
I believe the new stats should strive for viable solo roiding fleets. Not every attack should require emp to land.
|
Ppl attack in 4 and 5's for safety nothing else. It's not to with stats or trends or whatever it's simply 5 are more likely to land than 2. When DCIng multiple incs they single and 2's are easier to cover than the 4's and 5's.
It's just life. No stats will change it . If anything tias idea to make you need 4 or 5 nullifies this to a degree but you will never stop ppl doing it.
I'm with isil, ppl who reply and 'debate' here are too idealistic and think stats can solve all pa problems, THEY CANT
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 15:26
|
#61
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
None of the posts in this thread so far get us a nanometer closer to a set of stats for r58. So let's get the ball rolling. I made this a while back: http://pastebin.com/ByHPH5bJ
High level info:
- Mixed ST/MT
- 2-3 pods per race
- Partial SKs
I suggest getting a bunch of basic stat sets together (classes, targetting, types, inits) and picking the best of the lot for one person to develop further (with advice from others).
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 16:26
|
#62
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R58 Stats
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 16:37
|
#63
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
I will come up with my stats within two days.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 16:41
|
#64
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R58 Stats
I like Mz's giving xan only two pods, should make it slightly easier to balance them by reducing the faking options slightly. I presume etd and zik only get two due to having steal ships that may capture pods?
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 17:09
|
#65
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R58 Stats
Mz normally has epic Pegasus ship in his stats. Lets play them
|
|
|
13 Jul 2014, 20:53
|
#66
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by booji
I like Mz's giving xan only two pods, should make it slightly easier to balance them by reducing the faking options slightly. I presume etd and zik only get two due to having steal ships that may capture pods?
|
Yes. Cat gets 3 because Cat faking is hilariously pointless. Ter gets 3 because I like Ter. BIAS TIME. (Also their race characteristic is the weakest of all the races.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Mz normally has epic Pegasus ship in his stats. Lets play them
|
It's a ******** legacy, I'm afraid.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 06:15
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R58 Stats
We need to get the people that are ACTUALLY going to part of this committee sitting down and talking NOT on the forums. We could make a Google.docs or have a IRC channel to post ideas/thoughts etc...
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 08:59
|
#68
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R58 Stats
Me + Mz, boom, committee sorted!
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 14:25
|
#69
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 52
|
Re: R58 Stats
Stop wasting time yelling "committee" and look at the stats from Blue_Esper and MZ.
Atleast they have put something together to try to get this started.
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 16:20
|
#70
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
Okey, now ive started putting the stats together.
You can kind of see where im heading with these stats, allthough i havnt used enough time to put the stats together to look through them yet, might be something ive overlooked.
The amount of pod classes and ships might mess with some people, but its on purpose.
If there is some question or pointers to the ship classes/init, ill look through them now as im gonna start putting in armor/damage/empres/cost
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 16:53
|
#71
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 52
|
Re: R58 Stats
BB you can do a 3 ship build in every race...I think we need to have a ST round again, instead of people just spamming 2-3 ships all round they will be forced to make 4-5 ships.
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 18:18
|
#72
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillyNilly
BB you can do a 3 ship build in every race...I think we need to have a ST round again, instead of people just spamming 2-3 ships all round they will be forced to make 4-5 ships.
|
So we want stats thats open for soloing, playable for alliances who defend, and that requires you to build a lot of diffrent ship classes?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 18:57
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 52
|
Re: R58 Stats
MT rounds are always defensive rounds...people emoing about LOLWAVES...those stats won't help lessen that, it will probably cause people to make even larger team ups to land.
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 18:59
|
#74
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
So we want stats thats open for soloing, playable for alliances who defend, and that requires you to build a lot of diffrent ship classes?
|
There is no "we". Individual people want things. Make stats that you think work. Variety is good.
(That said, MT stats tend to be more defensive, and overly defensive stats tend to make for bad rounds. I am still not convinced that all MT stats are necessarily overly defensive.)
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 19:10
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 157
|
Re: R58 Stats
__________________
BOOM
|
|
|
14 Jul 2014, 23:08
|
#76
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
There is no "we". Individual people want things. Make stats that you think work. Variety is good.
(That said, MT stats tend to be more defensive, and overly defensive stats tend to make for bad rounds. I am still not convinced that all MT stats are necessarily overly defensive.)
|
Well this is what i was heading at, i dont think these stats are as "defensively" other MT stats might tend to be.
Stats differs, its hard to make good stats as poiitics also differs from round to round,
Im making the stats i think would be good for next round
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
16 Jul 2014, 14:16
|
#77
|
PA Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,449
|
Re: R58 Stats
My bad. I haven't been paying attention and suddenly we have 5 sets coming out of the woodwork. FIVE sets. I'm not sure we've ever had more than 2 sets.
I don't know what to do. panic. panic. hide. BloodyButcher was the first one to nudge me on IRC so he's currently setting his stats up on the beta server, but I'll try and have a quick review today of the others - is anyone willing to say theirs are near finished?
__________________
r8-10 RaH r10.5-12 MISTU
|
|
|
16 Jul 2014, 15:37
|
#78
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: R58 Stats
Just to clarify appoco. Would it be possible to have the "all etd" round mentioned in the other thread?
Not in r58 obviously, but sometime soon
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 11:03
|
#79
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appocomaster
is anyone willing to say theirs are near finished?
|
Not me.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 13:08
|
#80
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appocomaster
My bad. I haven't been paying attention and suddenly we have 5 sets coming out of the woodwork. FIVE sets. I'm not sure we've ever had more than 2 sets.
I don't know what to do. panic. panic. hide. BloodyButcher was the first one to nudge me on IRC so he's currently setting his stats up on the beta server, but I'll try and have a quick review today of the others - is anyone willing to say theirs are near finished?
|
Imho you should select one of the many stats in development to support and concentrate efforts on that one or let the chaos reign and just look for an old set of stats from a previous round that you could copy-paste comfortably if everything else fails.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 13:24
|
#81
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortran
Imho you should select one of the many stats in development to support and concentrate efforts on that one or let the chaos reign and just look for an old set of stats from a previous round that you could copy-paste comfortably if everything else fails.
|
its impossibole to fail at making stats
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 13:36
|
#82
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortran
Imho you should select one of the many stats in development to support and concentrate efforts on that one or let the chaos reign and just look for an old set of stats from a previous round that you could copy-paste comfortably if everything else fails.
|
I think that if we let this continue for a couple of more weeks, at most 2 sets of stats would remain viable, and choosing between them shouldn't be too hard.
...But admittedly, I'm not certain.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 15:06
|
#83
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R58 Stats
id say mine are finished, but would need to check the EMP effs
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 15:58
|
#84
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
its impossibole to fail at making stats
|
but it is not impossible to make fail stats
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 15:59
|
#85
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
id say mine are finished, but would need to check the EMP effs
|
I actualy started in the opposite direction, first check EMP eff, thrn moving from there
Guess its because im a cath player
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 18:16
|
#86
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R58 Stats
I think we should throw Blue_espers stats into beta for now let him tweak emps effs and see what comes out. They looks the closest to finished.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 19:01
|
#87
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
I think we should throw Blue_espers stats into beta for now let him tweak emps effs and see what comes out. They looks the closest to finished.
|
Im soon finished with mine, and all the time i used putting it into beta would be a waste then
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 22:01
|
#88
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R58 Stats
It is indeed a pretty horrific interface. Appoco, import function please!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
17 Jul 2014, 23:50
|
#89
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R58 Stats
Well i just hope you plan on balancing those a/c d/c's B-Butcher. As it stands terran is not going to be played unless you give them an ally def vs fi.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
18 Jul 2014, 00:34
|
#90
|
PA Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,449
|
Re: R58 Stats
okay people justify to me why you think your stats are worth playing and what characteristics drive them!
__________________
r8-10 RaH r10.5-12 MISTU
|
|
|
18 Jul 2014, 02:49
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Well i just hope you plan on balancing those a/c d/c's B-Butcher. As it stands terran is not going to be played unless you give them an ally def vs fi.
|
like that is the big issue with that set
|
|
|
18 Jul 2014, 03:50
|
#92
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Well i just hope you plan on balancing those a/c d/c's B-Butcher. As it stands terran is not going to be played unless you give them an ally def vs fi.
|
I havnt started on the AC/DC realy, but its all in the beta server now "almost".
http://beta.planetarion.com/manual.p...n=550866724996
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Jul 2014, 07:44
|
#93
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appocomaster
okay people justify to me why you think your stats are worth playing and what characteristics drive them!
|
well i haven't had any comments on my stats, but apart from EMP eff and perhaps giving zik and cath a non steal/emp ship if people have some serious issue there. They're ready to go.
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 00:25
|
#94
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 24
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
its impossibole to fail at making stats
|
Unless you're Tia
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 03:15
|
#95
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enyeez
Unless you're Tia
|
Well we clearly have a totaly diffrent approach to making the stats.
For me its about making stats that can be played in certain ways, after having a chat with Tia, it seems to me he thinks the players will find ways to play the stats themself.
Though he might be good at making the numbers and stuff look nice.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 06:31
|
#96
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 51
|
Re: R58 Stats
Stats will always suck until all races are treated equal on cov ops!!!! Tired of having to be cath to properly covert op!!!
Just remember that good stats and bad stats don't always make up the race comp of the universe. People like xan for cloak, people like cath for emp, people like zik cause they can steal and crazy high effiencies. People also chose cath because of covert ops and quick research for scans. Likewise people will always choose Terran due to construction spamming be it amps, dists, fc's, or now mc's.
Now seriously.... Make other races equal/on par with cath with covert ops. I'm sooooo tired of emp
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 07:24
|
#97
|
idle
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 968
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
|
erm...is it me!? or is that the new Planetarion2.0 ???
2 podclasses for TER and ZIK, 3 for CAT and XAN and ETD even with 4 ?
And thats because TER was so overpowered the last 10 rounds ? I can only imagine this set to be a late aprils fool.
ok after lookin on more then the podclasses i have to rephrase the aprils fools wording.
How is anyone going to play anything else but FR with this set, while the only option to roid those FR forts is attacking them with FR !?
please pick another set now, so the guy doing it has enough time to tweak ACDC, thank you
__________________
m0rph3us formerly known as Bugz
"Itīs not about how hard u hit, its about how hard u can get hit and still keep moving forward! How much u can take and still move forward!"
Last edited by M0RPH3US; 19 Jul 2014 at 07:34.
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 08:38
|
#98
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R58 Stats
anyone got comments on the stats i did?
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 10:15
|
#99
|
idle
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 968
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
anyone got comments on the stats i did?
|
other then that it has 3 pods each race it looks good on first sight (i really dislike those 3 pod stuff, but it seems to be wanted by many)
you got my vote to take that beta-spot for your set, instead of the FR/DE fort stuff
__________________
m0rph3us formerly known as Bugz
"Itīs not about how hard u hit, its about how hard u can get hit and still keep moving forward! How much u can take and still move forward!"
|
|
|
19 Jul 2014, 10:38
|
#100
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 157
|
Re: R58 Stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
anyone got comments on the stats i did?
|
Please, please, consider going to 2 pod classes. The universe is so much better that way
__________________
BOOM
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:17.
| |