|
|
7 Feb 2012, 14:02
|
#51
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
ND and CT whining about ult and xVx sticking together after so many rounds of only having each others help vs other blocks? kind of stupid really, i remember a few rounds where CT and ND have NAP'd more majority of a round being rank 1 and 2.
Admittedly though this round has been very boring, roid races just have no real enjoyment, and for once i would like to see some kind of block against us (ult) just so that we can have a challenge :s if that involves xVx then so be it, at least we could possibly have a mutually craved war
|
ND is planettargetting CT, so i doubt they're on their side.
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 15:00
|
#52
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: xVx
at least we fight for #1, even when we cant win. I think ults will testify to that.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 15:46
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: xVx
Nitros I did say previous rounds, not this one
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 17:33
|
#54
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: xVx
apologies, i must have missread or misunderstood it.
edit: typo
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
Last edited by Nitros; 7 Feb 2012 at 18:03.
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 18:32
|
#55
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
at least we fight for #1, even when we cant win. I think ults will testify to that.
|
If CT hasn't fixed it's defence culture ... good luck
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 18:45
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: xVx
Who's saying that it has to be xVx that declares war on Ult. If any of the other allys where to block up and war with ult then it would still get it done. Tof, Dlr both of them are capable of warring Ult they are just staying out of the fight to keep there top member count.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 19:44
|
#57
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: xVx
To me this is quite simple.
CT/ND want to win just as much as Ult. And they do what they can to win.
Now in the past they have had to, due to Apprime being so clear ahead in skill level. And even then, had Apprime wanted to, they could have made a counter and probably won.
Now, Ult obviously want to win and will be in no rush to hit xVx, they can carry on as they are and they will win.
ND/CT are in the position that to stand any chance of winning they would have to hit Ult. However, if they were able to do it hard enough to knock back Ult, it would take such a massive concerted effort that xVx would then walk away with the win. So ND/CT couldn't possibly win.
The only way ND/CT would have a chance of winning is if xVx were to hit Ult too.
Now, why should xVx hit Ult? Again, to me this is simple. If they do nothing and carry on, as explained above, Ult would walk away with the win.
The ONLY chance xVx have to win would be to hit Ult along with a ND/CT (or a fang block). Doing nothing would 1) stop xVx winning and 2) make sure xVx became more of an attractive target (they will be only aliance with roids once Ult have roided the rest down).
Sadly, xVx seem too scared of losing roids, to risk winning the round.
If it was me, assuming the top 5 are only contenders for the win:
Ultores - They just need to sit tight, keep a couple of naps with top 5 and farm the rest down.
xVx - Possibly in the strongest position of the 2-5 ranks. Block up with the other 3 and take down Ult. Politics open up and they need to be fluid and skillful to take advantage.
Fang - I fancy their chances. Same scenario as xVx. The question is, can they handle a war so soon back. My position is, if they can't then they won't survive long anyway. War will make or break an alliance.
CT/ND - Total outsiders, I don't think they can win, but joining a block to start with against Ultores and staying under the radar gives them an outside chance.
Of course, all this depends on xVx. If xVx stay with Ult then they won't stand a chance of winning but neither will anyone else and so will get hit out of revenge or because they get roid heavy.
Just my two pence
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 20:01
|
#58
|
Always MadcowS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 439
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Korsan do you not understand that everyone hates it when the same alliances group up. It means there's no change. Why can't xVx and Ult just have a good old fashion 1v1 war, and if another alliance takes advantage of this war to hit one of them then both of you smash them into the group.
Oh wait if that happens Ult will win because xVx doesn't have the player base to go 1v1 with ult.
|
This game is not about having 1 vs 1 wars. That's what dozens of rounds of constant napping taught us. If xvx fights Ultores the only ones who'll lose will be xvx AND ultores because there will be many shipjumpers. I bet all you politics HCs wait for such a chance...
I remember very clear how CT and ND napped the shit out of the universe just to ptarget every alliance 1 by 1. As we know some of PA's best known alliances play like I think we could agree that giving them an opportunity to carry on their coward wars would politically not be the best thing to do.
Use your (CT/ND + minions) teamup/nap tactics now, attack ultores and let xvx be the ones that benefit from it..
...No? Congratulations! Then you got my point.
__________________
[Flash][Madcows][Howling Rain][Vision][Osiris][horde][xVx]
And...
Relation Change Ascendancy and the Horde are now at war with each other.
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 22:41
|
#59
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
at least we fight for #1, even when we cant win. I think ults will testify to that.
|
I tell you what, you are persistent in attacks, and hit fence galaxies like men!
|
|
|
7 Feb 2012, 23:25
|
#60
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
bla bla
|
So what you are saying is, without xVx, fang/ct/nd/app/dlr are unable to hit ult?
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 00:03
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North
Posts: 227
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
So what you are saying is, without xVx, fang/ct/nd/app/dlr are unable to hit ult?
|
I think what they say is:
if u want a guy beaten up, you go slap another guy in the face a couple of times, and tell him to go beat him up....
__________________
Memento mori !
VisioN Forever!
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 06:28
|
#62
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
So what you are saying is, without xVx, fang/ct/nd/app/dlr are unable to hit ult?
|
No, what I am saying is without xVx, there is NO POINT in the others hitting ult.
But I guess you knew that and have to do all yu can to keep on xVx onside, as with xVx you will walk the round and without them you won't
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 06:44
|
#63
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
No, what I am saying is without xVx, there is NO POINT in the others hitting ult.
But I guess you knew that and have to do all yu can to keep on xVx onside, as with xVx you will walk the round and without them you won't
|
I am not hc of ult this round, so I havent done anything to keep xVx on our side, nor will I.
I just find it hilarious that you actually think its pointless to hit ult without them
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 07:19
|
#64
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: xVx
Oh well I didnt know that, I am not playing the round.
If the aim of CT/ND is to win, and they can't do that without xVx (only a fool would suggest xVx wouldn't win if they cruised to vistory whilst Ult and co are engaged in war, then what is the point in CT/ND hitting Ult?
Tell me, if you were HC of either and wanted to win, but xVx wouldn't join with you, what would you do?
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 08:11
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 161
|
Re: xVx
I would gather allies and start hitting both Ult and xVx.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 09:15
|
#66
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
So what you are saying is, without xVx, fang/ct/nd/app/dlr are unable to hit ult?
|
I suggest re-reading his post....
Wow, coming away with that perception is crazy
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 11:28
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Oh well I didnt know that, I am not playing the round.
If the aim of CT/ND is to win, and they can't do that without xVx (only a fool would suggest xVx wouldn't win if they cruised to vistory whilst Ult and co are engaged in war, then what is the point in CT/ND hitting Ult?
Tell me, if you were HC of either and wanted to win, but xVx wouldn't join with you, what would you do?
|
If they want to win they should hit the alliance they have to beat in order to win. Just because they don't get the support of 1 alliance does not mean they shouldn't try at all and instead just sit and complain about it.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 11:31
|
#68
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
I suggest re-reading his post....
Wow, coming away with that perception is crazy
|
Thats pretty much what both him and gm are saying
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 11:48
|
#69
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
If they want to win they should hit the alliance they have to beat in order to win. Just because they don't get the support of 1 alliance does not mean they shouldn't try at all and instead just sit and complain about it.
|
yeah, but that would point out their own incompetence... better to hide behind the incompetence of others.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 11:57
|
#70
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Thats pretty much what both him and gm are saying
|
No they're not.
He was saying if ND/CT hit Ultores it will hand xVx the win.
Simple as....
PM on irc if you need further assistance in understand people's posts.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 12:09
|
#71
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
No they're not.
He was saying if ND/CT hit Ultores it will hand xVx the win.
Simple as....
PM on irc if you need further assistance in understand people's posts.
|
And if xVx hit ult they would still get no incs, which means the outcome would be the same..
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 12:55
|
#72
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
And if xVx hit ult they would still get no incs, which means the outcome would be the same..
|
but if xVx hits ult with CT/ND/whoever, CT/ND feel confident they can make a deal with ult later to hit xVx, possibly resulting in CT catching up eventually...
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 13:54
|
#73
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
but if xVx hits ult with CT/ND/whoever, CT/ND feel confident they can make a deal with ult later to hit xVx, possibly resulting in CT catching up eventually...
|
I agree. It's better to end second by staying napped to everyone until the end of the round, than it is to take a shot at #1. Because, you know, if you can't pull it off, you will end second. Or if you do pull it off, some alliance might overtake you later on and then you'll end second. Or maybe even third! Oh my god!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 17:52
|
#74
|
...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 146
|
Re: xVx
Seems pretty clear to me that xvx aren't playing for tag win and sticking to the old " we play for fun and to get high gal / planet ranks " which is fair play. As it stands ND and CT wont get 2nd or 1st because they lack the balls to go for it. Ult has no reason to make a change of any kind because as it stands and as they have proved all round so far they can out roid xvx. FanG doesnt seem up to making a push for the win despite some good defencive showings the roid gains over the round seem pretty slim in comparison to those around them(us) also for a first round back a solid 2nd/3rd/4th is pretty good considering many expected it to collapse. As it stands xvx are meeting their round objectives and in doing so have no desire to win. If they win a round whilst meeting their objectives to play for fun/planet/gal ranks then its a bonus nothing more.
I don't understand where people are coming from all the time saying the round is crap. xvx members / officers are probably happy doing what they are doing its not up to us to decide its wrong. If you want to make an alliance to challenge ult gather like minded people and do it
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 18:32
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: xVx
fun fun fun.. lets get the gangraping started yo!
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 18:55
|
#76
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: xVx
haven't we been in this position before with xVx (round 31)? why are people so shocked and surprised
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 19:03
|
#77
|
Forever VisioN
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 142
|
Re: xVx
why would we want to work with people that attack us anyways :P
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 19:10
|
#78
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: xVx
whats the case with picking on xvx btw? they should hit ultores why exactly? isnt this ovbious that nd and ct will try to make an effort in taking ultores down, in which case, I just cant see the point why xvx should hit ultores as well and take the heat from that?
after hittin ult and succeeding in it, who will be the next taken down? ofc the alliance that is #1 at that point, which most prolly would be xvx.. and thats the place where xvx would fail vs incs from nd/ct/ult and maybe even fang..
ppl telling that this is over and that xvx is shit for not attacking and doing their own shit, are just incompetent and useless theirselves im afraid :/
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 19:25
|
#79
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 386
|
Re: xVx
Tbh, why should anyone but xVx and FanG look to be taking down Ultores when they're pretty much the 2 others with a chance of winning? They're the ones that should be asking people to hit Ultores.
__________________
Adapt has never been an official ND HC. He was on his way to promotion for some reason, but then got denied promotion. Lol at the muppet claiming he has been
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 19:32
|
#80
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: xVx
Please STFU!
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:27
|
#81
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: xVx
Wow. This must surely be a new peak in maturity for AD. Good job!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:28
|
#82
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: xVx
The thing that I don't understand is, that is ND and CT and/or Fang group up to hit Ult how that gets xVx the win. If they join the block the get roided as being the #2 ally targeting the #1 ally and also breaking a nap. If they stay out of the block then ct/nd/fang all roid down the roidfat Ult and xp like a mofo. After a few nights of that xvx and Fang will be tied and it will be a 3 man race for 1st only ult wont have any roids but will still have all the value.
The other thing your missing is that Ult also has allies none of which are availed in-game but since Fang is new it wont be that hard to get an ally to join vs them. And since xVx has bitched out this round so far it wont be that hard to get someone to roid them, ontop of that ct/nd/fang will also be roid enriched because of the Ult roidings and will be prime targets for p-targeting.
So in short, Ult stay neutral and you'll win. xVx you need to get your ass off the ground and war someone, doenst have to be ult and get yourself some roids because you will lose the roid race with ult because there player base is better than yours. Fang/ct/nd get off your asses and roid The fatty allys (ultores, Dlr, apprime)
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:30
|
#83
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buly
Tbh, why should anyone but xVx and FanG look to be taking down Ultores when they're pretty much the 2 others with a chance of winning? They're the ones that should be asking people to hit Ultores.
|
Hehe, im sure the 40 man allie FAnG are pretty flattered that you look at them as top contender for the round, but lets be serious, its clearly only the well established alliances like CT/xVx/Ultores who will withstand pressure from heavy incs for a few days straight.
xVx seem to enjoy trying to fence it out, but it looks to me that tactic isnt pulling in their direction atm.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:33
|
#84
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: xVx
By 40, I assume you mean 68? It's an easy mistake to make.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Last edited by Mzyxptlk; 8 Feb 2012 at 20:33.
Reason: High five Tia!
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:33
|
#85
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: xVx
Well actually the last time i looked FAnG had 68 members.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:40
|
#86
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
By 40, I assume you mean 68? It's an easy mistake to make.
|
A lot of their members is ex FAnGers who have signed up to be social, and maybe do a scan or two. They are mostly there for moral support during day time. Its pretty normal for old returning alliances in PA, and we have seen it over and over again in previous rounds
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 20:52
|
#87
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: xVx
Every alliance has 20-30 morons-slash-inactives. I've talked to people in Ultores who (and I quote) feel "embarrassed by ult" because "people are so shit". As for xVx, well, let's put it like this: xVx is hardly a beacon of PA brilliance.
Obviously, being in FAnG, you're more than willing to play down your own numbers, but you are either being intentionally deceitful or blissfully ignorant about your counterparts in other alliance if you continue to state you have a disproportionate number of inactives. In either case, you'll have to forgive me for disregarding anything you have to say on the matter.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2012, 21:22
|
#88
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
A lot of their members is ex FAnGers who have signed up to be social, and maybe do a scan or two. They are mostly there for moral support during day time. Its pretty normal for old returning alliances in PA, and we have seen it over and over again in previous rounds
|
Actually theres only a handful of the origonal fang core in fang this round. A lot of the players are new blood come from allies such as TGV, p3ng, kennys failed allie etc. I should know, i had a lovely time in recruiting most of them. (dont see the point in hiding that fact.. wish there was more origonal fangers from the old days etc)
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
9 Feb 2012, 17:05
|
#89
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Wow. This must surely be a new peak in maturity for AD. Good job!
|
Thank you. I am trying really hard!
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 01:32
|
#90
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: xVx
Relation Change 853 xVx has decided to end its alliance with Ultores.
Relation Change 1108 Ultores and xVx have confirmed they are allied.
What are xVx up to now? U getting lonely?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 01:58
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: xVx
they decided another back-stab was on the cards, break agreements and hide behind ults again. they want 8:6 to win.... but wouldn't ults want 6:1 to win??
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 06:58
|
#92
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: xVx
lets have a correction here.. coolkat decided a backstab was on the cards.. not xVx. Coolkat is hcing for 2 more days then stepping down, Chimpie is afk atm through rl problems. I personally said it was a bad idea but he is quite gung ho and belived it was the best course of action.
What i love reading into the joint channel i was kicked from last night is how FaNG ppl and CT are once again bleating on about how it will affect xVx going into the next round, 'no one will trust you' and 'no one will work with you'.... thats bollocks. This is the same CT who said this a few rounds ago after xVx didnt honour a nap cooldown (love that term, if your not friends why would you wait for somoene to hit you!!??) yet it was CT who came knocking at xVx's door at tick 500 to help them hit Ultores.
Regardless of who joined when and what joined who the whole round has been a shambles for everyone apart from Ultores. Yes xVx can be blamed for not joining the original block (as i said on iRc last night if i had been a HC i would have joined but would have insisted on a smaller block (CT, xVx, FaNG only). But FaNG can also be blamed equally, they joined the original block but when xVx finally joined faNg had decided to nap Ultores and go farming NewDawn. FaNG's choice here decided their round and the round in general more.. they had a chance to win alliance and instead dithered on a decision for 5 days before joining - those 5 days could have been the difference.
Now were into the last 3 days hitting Ultores (expect 6.1) is pointless. They are too far ahead and why would it be practical to continue hitting them???
Anyway anothr screwed up round of PA, all it has down is made people more wary of xVxs intention when allied.... look forward to working with you all again next round o/
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 07:09
|
#93
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm;
they decided another back-stab was on the cards, break agreements and hide behind ults again. they want 8:6 to win.... but wouldn't ults want 6:1 to win??
|
Surely us getting less incs due to xvx not attacking us means there's a bigger chance of that happening?
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 07:31
|
#94
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
they decided another back-stab was on the cards, break agreements and hide behind ults again. they want 8:6 to win.... but wouldn't ults want 6:1 to win??
|
Well whats the point in hitting ult after all this time..
The hit Ult pretty much for 3 weeks straight & we went up in roids..
Did FAnG honestly believe they could catch up so much to Ult at any point?
The only reason Ult lost value was due to people slacking cause it was too easy this round.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 10:00
|
#95
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: xVx
fang`s initiating was worth a shot i guess.. + being untargeted for quite whole round took em close, tho not nearly enough
unless... we have hirr bg or something like that in our tag that crash in the end.. millions and millions
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 10:10
|
#96
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Surely us getting less incs due to xvx not attacking us means there's a bigger chance of that happening?
|
omg eksero, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???
Read it again..
I am pretty sure he meant that but ok.... Gm you better answer
ek you truely are so moronic.. even kaiba understands stuff you miss!
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 11:06
|
#97
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
But FaNG can also be blamed equally, they joined the original block but when xVx finally joined faNg had decided to nap Ultores and go farming NewDawn. FaNG's choice here decided their round and the round in general more.. they had a chance to win alliance and instead dithered on a decision for 5 days before joining - those 5 days could have been the difference.
|
It took FAnG to nap Ult for xVx to actually do anything. You wouldn't have dropped the nap had we not napped Ultores. You joined for fear of Ult/FAnG teaming on you guys, even though Ultores repeatedly denied our request for them to...
Actually it was only 2 days where we "dithered", mainly due to internal disagreements which has resulted in some unfortunate actions/decisions.
IMO our chance at ally win ended the moment xVx wouldn't join the block and therefore we backed out as all that would happen was the block would steadily decline, giving Ult the breather they needed to hit us along with xVx, which is what would have happened (we were the fattest target in the block by a country mile)...those 2 days (5 in your view) wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference!
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 13:24
|
#98
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
CT are once again bleating on about how it will affect xVx going into the next round, 'no one will trust you' and 'no one will work with you'.... thats bollocks. This is the same CT who said this a few rounds ago after xVx didnt honour a nap cooldown (love that term, if your not friends why would you wait for somoene to hit you!!??) yet it was CT who came knocking at xVx's door at tick 500 to help them hit Ultores.
|
you may find it took about 4 rounds and me bping your leader a few rounds to improve relations for us to really want to work with you again. yet we never napped xvx!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 13:47
|
#99
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
omg eksero, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???
Read it again..
I am pretty sure he meant that but ok.... Gm you better answer
ek you truely are so moronic.. even kaiba understands stuff you miss!
|
Relax buddy ;D
|
|
|
29 Feb 2012, 19:32
|
#100
|
Ark-miner wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,005
|
Re: xVx
Quote:
Originally Posted by neroon
unless... we have hirr bg or something like that in our tag that crash in the end.. millions and millions
|
Nono thats not possible..if you do it on purpose you risk getting closed for donating as we found out the last round we played :/
(yeayea not serious from you but hirr highlighted for me )
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56.
| |