Galaxy sizes

[DrunkenViking]

Originally Posted by Kal

/me sighs

Instead of complaining about the current system, its maybe worth you remembering how everyone complained about the split universe system as well. A split universe will not get us new players, this system will as they get to meet existing players. Next round will be improved as they won't be being exiled as soon as they arrive. But people will still be able to exile the people who really do do nothing, but they will have to be much more careful about it, as galaxies won't be able to exile if they get to small.

Its this simple, like it or hate it, but as long as I have a say there will never be 2 universes.

Bah, ok, what about just making the gtalaxies smaller then? make it so its never more than 15 ppl in a galaxy?

[ChubbyChecker]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Bah, ok, what about just making the gtalaxies smaller then? make it so its never more than 15 ppl in a galaxy?

How do you do that though? The only way to do it would be to increase the number of buddy packs in the game, something that PA Team have no control over.

[Virall]

Originally Posted by Kal

somewhere in the depths of the Round 14 Galaxy setup thread is the final solution being implemented for next round.

next round buddy packs can be of size 2 or 3 - giving 6 buddy pack members per gal again.

if it was in effect a private gal of 4 or 5, then the randoms would be entirly excluded from things as all the private people would know each other.

The only way to make a private part of a galaxy smaller would be to goto 2 packs of 2 in a gal which probably endangers to many people to be in poor galaxies.

However by allowing either 3*2 or 2*3 in a gal it may well encourage people who didn;t go into packs last time to join them, thus increasing the number of galaxies and hence decreasing the size of the galaxies.

Erm, buddy packs of 2 or 3? If this were the case and buddy packs were going to be restricted by numbers, I for one would've appreciated some more notice as I've already organised mine!

[ChubbyChecker]

Weren't the buddy packs 3 man in Round 13? I'm not sure cos I missed the start.

[Proxi]

Originally Posted by ChubbyChecker

Weren't the buddy packs 3 man in Round 13? I'm not sure cos I missed the start.

Yep, and the ones that weren't full got deleted I believe

[ChubbyChecker]

k. So why is Virall complaining?

[cypher]

Originally Posted by Chaos

bah.. *enter insult here*
we didn't fencesit at all. we had lots of Exil incomming. hell I even had to organize a lot of HR incomming on our gal.

we had incomming each frelling day/night so please don't spew crap like that.
1:2 won fairly. and it had NOTHING todo with alliances or their politics.

I don't belive there is any ally in the top15 that didn't attack us at one point.

infact alliance politics made it more difficult for us, since we couldn't defend hostiles in our gal.
so whenever we had incomming half the gal couldn't def the other half. and visaversa.

Your gal just wasn't as good. plain and simple. accept it. don't be a soar looser.

Look i never said you played bad or whatever. However i did say you didn't have the incomings other gals had (atleast at start). If you think i'm lieing ask CBK if your gal would have had more incoming if he hadn't been in the gal or not.
I've got logs from exi guys saying they would have hit it alot more hadn't the exi guys tried their best to avoid exi hitting them...

and no offence to any alliance... but only real threat (when hitting a galaxy) was exi this round. Further i doubt angels did real wave attacks on 1:2 as they mostly went for easy roids. I don't think 1up did real big attacks either as to be quite honest i don't think we were capable of them this round. So don't say you had same sort of incs as the other high ranking gals or players as you didn't even had nearly same sort of incomings

You won tho and you played it well politically which was nicely done by CBK

[Chaos]

Please don't spew crap when you have no idea wtf your talking about.
we had lots of Exil incomming. and we had lots of incomming from the attack coop. as 1:2 was on the top of their list most of the round. and the only way for Exil to hit us even more, would be to hit us each and every day. but then they'd just end up piggybacking the other attackers.

gawd what a soar looser you are.

[ChubbyChecker]

APA never attacked 1:2

That's why you won

[cypher]

Originally Posted by Chaos

Please don't spew crap when you have no idea wtf your talking about.
we had lots of Exil incomming. and we had lots of incomming from the attack coop. as 1:2 was on the top of their list most of the round. and the only way for Exil to hit us even more, would be to hit us each and every day. but then they'd just end up piggybacking the other attackers.

gawd what a soar looser you are.

lol as i said ask him

/me pets

[Chaos]

rofl. god your pathetic. Let's just drop the subject, ok?

atm we've hijacked the thread.

it was supposed to be about gal size.

[Virall]

Originally Posted by ChubbyChecker

k. So why is Virall complaining?

'Complaining' is a little harsh imo. But to clarify, I suggest you read the quote that was included in my thread; the 'complaint' was aimed at the possible uncertainty of buddy pack sizes. I've already organised my buddy pack of 3 (like it was last round) and would be disappointed if I had to re-organise.

[ChubbyChecker]

Originally Posted by Virall

'Complaining' is a little harsh imo. But to clarify, I suggest you read the quote that was included in my thread; the 'complaint' was aimed at the possible uncertainty of buddy pack sizes. I've already organised my buddy pack of 3 (like it was last round) and would be disappointed if I had to re-organise.

Kal is saying that next round you can either have 2 or 3 planets in a buddy pack. I believe that in Round 13 it was 3 or nothing? So your 3 man buddy pack is fine