Planetarion Forums - Interesting early average roid count

Stifler · 23 Oct 2004, 07:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shev

Then use the frigates for the first couple of attacks and be slower to CR. Xan especially are vulnerable to frigates in the early stages.

its better as cath to get your CR by tick 101

not much anti CR anywhere which means you can hit 2 large targets and cap ~75 roids per target, from targets who are bigger then you. That gives you a lot of XP early on

jerome · 23 Oct 2004, 07:25

Tick 225

Code:

			
Rank	Name		Members	A.S.	Score Rank	
1  	1up		58	431	8
2	LCH		100	366	1
3	NewDawn		85	335	5
4	Howling Rain	90	329	4	
5	MISTU		97	327	2	
6	NoS		74	315	9	
7	[VsN]		72	315	10	
8	Absolute	99	311	3
9	Vengeance 	86	303	7
10	Wolfpack	90	294	6

A.S. being average size ofcourse.

Chika · 23 Oct 2004, 09:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_

Tick 225

Code:

			
Rank	Name		Members	A.S.	Score Rank	
1  	1up		58	431	8
2	LCH		100	366	1
3	NewDawn		85	335	5
4	Howling Rain	90	329	4	
5	MISTU		97	327	2	
6	NoS		74	315	9	
7	[VsN]		72	315	10	
8	Absolute	99	311	3
9	Vengeance 	86	303	7
10	Wolfpack	90	294	6

A.S. being average size ofcourse.

3 NewDawn 85 335 5
4 Howling Rain 90 329 4
5 MISTU 97 327 2

This portion being very disturbing. GG Mistu. I made an account to come roid your HC.

suave · 23 Oct 2004, 09:13

come to irc chika :P

The_Fish · 23 Oct 2004, 10:32

Join ND and play properly chika!

And it's more a WD to us and HR than a 'you suck' to MISTU.

waffle · 23 Oct 2004, 17:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix

that would just be silly, since there isn't much penalty for having more roids than you can mine. I vote for ineffective Absolute military command and/or noobish players who dont like to attack.

I'm pretty sure that Dogs is in charge of the militiary for Absolute. So I'm not surprised at all why everyone is still on 300 roids. Dogs = noob.

Tomkat · 24 Oct 2004, 00:23

How are Absolute doing now? Has Dogs managed to whip up an effective raid yet?

G.K Zhukov · 24 Oct 2004, 04:57

Doesnt seem so Tomkat, Absolute has 322 roids on average.

1up is recruiting, or have they just "hidden" their members?

Vision is dispointing, compared to the last round.

HR will go past Absolute.
Insomnias average score is impressing.

AzureWrath · 24 Oct 2004, 10:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov

....
Insomnias average score is impressing.

i just noticed that, their avg score is quite good, puts them at rank 5 in avg score

Helix · 24 Oct 2004, 12:25

insomnia did quite well last round too. Absolute is still doing abysmal and cant seem to even buy roids (well actually that seems to be the only way they can get roids

) Call it flaming or whatever you want, but the fact is that of all the top alliances, Absolute has done the worst at gaining asteroids out of protection. My two biggest disappointments this round would have to be VisioN and Absolute, I expected them to be contenders for the top, but it seems like we have a two horse race between LCH and MISTU, with HR and ND a length or two behind. Perhaps Absolute can pull their act together and get a second wind? but from what they have shown us so far that is doubtful.

jerome · 24 Oct 2004, 12:50

Vision HC already stated this would be a round where they "got their act together" or such, didn`t they?

Helix · 24 Oct 2004, 12:55

Well Vision were trying to weed out the bad seeds in their alliance, and only keep those dedicated to playing, but it hasn't seemed to increase their average score/size much at all in relation to the other alliances. Perhaps they will be able to withstand the troubles of wat better than some of the other alliances though, and thus grow stronger as the round goes on while others grow weaker.

Colt · 24 Oct 2004, 13:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by G.K Zhukov

Insomnias average score is impressing.

/me fluffl3s Jonas

The_Fish · 26 Oct 2004, 21:55

Update - PT311

LCH - 473
MISTU - 397
Absolute - 364
HR - 391
ND - 409
1up - 567
WP - 327
VGN - 370
NoS - 358
VsN - 360

Make of that what you will.

The_Fish · 27 Oct 2004, 16:15

LCH - 493
MISTU - 389
Absolute - 400
HR - 404
ND - 433
1up - 625
WP - 336
VgN - 372
NoS - 361
VsN - 379

So now Absolute arent doing that badly, and MISTU absolutely suck.... who keeps pounding them? LCH and/or 1up?

Are 1up going to be able to catch upto LCH before the round ends? Are they going to use their might and muscle to push someone else within distance of LCH? Do they maybe want LCH to win if they can't?

mazzelaar · 27 Oct 2004, 16:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

So now Absolute arent doing that badly, and MISTU absolutely suck.... who keeps pounding them? LCH and/or 1up?

Are 1up going to be able to catch upto LCH before the round ends? Are they going to use their might and muscle to push someone else within distance of LCH? Do they maybe want LCH to win if they can't?

I would've thought the answers to those questions were blatently obvious from those numbers everyone seems to be paying such attention to?

AzureWrath · 13 Nov 2004, 17:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

LCH - 493
MISTU - 389
Absolute - 400
HR - 404
ND - 433
1up - 625
WP - 336
VgN - 372
NoS - 361
VsN - 379

So now Absolute arent doing that badly, and MISTU absolutely suck.... who keeps pounding them? LCH and/or 1up?

Are 1up going to be able to catch upto LCH before the round ends? Are they going to use their might and muscle to push someone else within distance of LCH? Do they maybe want LCH to win if they can't?

TICK 329 -> TICK 739

LCH - 493 -> 998
MISTU - 389 -> 753
Absolute - 400 -> 457
HR - 404 -> 705
ND - 433 -> 745
1up - 625 -> 943
WP - 336 -> 600
VgN - 372 -> 556
NoS - 361 -> 474
VsN - 379 -> 717

Well...LCH passed 1up's lead on the average roidcount. Absolute pretty much stagnated (altho they have alot less members now. 1up have more members if that says anything). Not much more to say than that.

The_Fish · 13 Nov 2004, 22:33

that clearly shows LCH need to be stopped.

Treveler · 13 Nov 2004, 23:56

An alliance need to step forward and go for the #1 spot, couse atm every alliance besides LCH seems satisfied with being a runner up.

LCH is running away with the title atm and if we want to do something about it we must do it now! :-)

AzureWrath · 14 Nov 2004, 00:00

seems most alliances want a win handed to them instead of doing what's necessary to secure it

Stifler · 14 Nov 2004, 00:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzureWrath

seems most alliances want a win handed to them instead of doing what's necessary to secure it

I really hope you aint trying to imply we aint "bled" to stay up there....

AzureWrath · 14 Nov 2004, 00:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stifler

I really hope you aint trying to imply we aint "bled" to stay up there....

rather i was implying the other 'top' alliances atm, either dont have the capacity, or the will to claim #1 as theirs. They'd rather pussy about and concede to you. Probably, the hardest/slowest growth period for you was right after 1up declared war? When MISTU took the roidlead. MISTU fked things up and got owned shortly thereafter, but the point remains.

mazzelaar · 14 Nov 2004, 00:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stifler

I really hope you aint trying to imply we aint "bled" to stay up there....

Due to a complete lack of any strategic foresight by a number of alliances you have had a much easier ride than you probably should've done. Not to take anything away from LCH, as they have proved themselves to be worthy leaders at this point, but there are certain alliances who are quite willing to let you take control of the round simply to stay out of the line of fire.

Agerus · 14 Nov 2004, 00:48

LCH also took the lead in average score, wasn't that 1up domain

mazzelaar · 14 Nov 2004, 01:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agerus

LCH also took the lead in average score, wasn't that 1up domain

Only in average roids atm - they haven't managed to steal the score mantel _just_ yet

Kjeldoran · 14 Nov 2004, 01:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazzelaar

Only in average roids atm - they haven't managed to steal the score mantel _just_ yet

we're working on stealing mazzelaar from 1up. Only then we can call ourselves supreme winners of the round. Ohh and, if mazz goes, does that mean we get the mushroom aswell?

mazzelaar · 14 Nov 2004, 01:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

we're working on stealing mazzelaar from 1up. Only then we can call ourselves supreme winners of the round. Ohh and, if mazz goes, does that mean we get the mushroom aswell?

No, I only bring herpes with me courtesy of Zhil.

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2004, 02:53

Mistu getting hit by 5 alliances in 2 nights handed the huge lead to lch

CrazyConrad · 14 Nov 2004, 06:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fyodor

Mistu getting hit by 5 alliances in 2 nights handed the huge lead to lch

LCH getting hit by 5 alliance in 2 nights put Mistu 10k roids ahead, although LCH kept their score lead.

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2004, 06:54

Wasnt trying to compare lch and mistu. Obviously lch is stronger then mistu. I was trying to point out that 4 alliances under mistu by hitting them for those 2 nights have virtually guarenteed and lch win.

Stifler · 14 Nov 2004, 06:59

MISTU ensured that happened by some choices they made when lch/1up were at each others throats...

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2004, 07:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stifler

MISTU ensured that happened by some choices they made when lch/1up were at each others throats...

So Mistu did something to ensure that 5 alliances got together and waved them over the course of 2 nights? What was it that they did to all 5 alliances?

Gate · 14 Nov 2004, 10:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fyodor

Wasnt trying to compare lch and mistu. Obviously lch is stronger then mistu. I was trying to point out that 4 alliances under mistu by hitting them for those 2 nights have virtually guarenteed and lch win.

Whereas MISTU deciding to hit alliances below them instead of hitting LCH hasn't done anything to help this at all I suppose?

This is just as I've gathered, but I'm 99% sure it was MISTU who roided a T10 1up yesterday, and I think hit 1up targets besides. How is going after a rank 5 alliance, sapping def which would otherwise be used against LCH, stopping LCH from winning the round?

EDIT: lol, if my intel is right, my rank 200 gal is being hit by Absolute and Mistu. But don't listen to me, I'm a c*nt

Forest · 14 Nov 2004, 11:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gate

This is just as I've gathered, but I'm 99% sure it was MISTU who roided a T10 1up yesterday, and I think hit 1up targets besides. How is going after a rank 5 alliance, sapping def which would otherwise be used against LCH, stopping LCH from winning the round?

For the record, it was Mistu/VGN (Who are allied), lch and vsn taking down that top 10 planet

Scary stuff.

The only alliance beneffitting from this is LCH (they eliminate the enemy before turning on those who helped)

Gio2k · 14 Nov 2004, 14:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

that clearly shows LCH need to be stopped.

Finally! People must be blind to not see that LCH should have been getting heavy incoming already.

Psi_K · 14 Nov 2004, 14:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gio2k

Finally! People must be blind to not see that LCH should have been getting heavy incoming already.

I've been saying this for a least two days ...

Colt · 14 Nov 2004, 15:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gate

I'm a c*nt

so true...

Pity some HC's lacked the forsight to have stopped LCH from getting a lead so big heh...

Gate · 14 Nov 2004, 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest

For the record, it was Mistu/VGN (Who are allied), lch and vsn taking down that top 10 planet

Scary stuff.

The only alliance beneffitting from this is LCH (they eliminate the enemy before turning on those who helped)

Indeed...

Mistu/VGN/ND/HR/1up should hit LCH IMO.

My only knowledge of that came from it being a Mistu mate of mine boasting about the roids he got

The_Fish · 14 Nov 2004, 18:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colt

so true...

Pity some HC's lacked the forsight to have stopped LCH from getting a lead so big heh...

Namely your own

Tesla · 25 Nov 2004, 16:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Wow 350 roids at the beginning what a good indication of who's going to win?

In hindsight you can say that all the indications that are shown in the first post has become a reality cant you ?
Ofc, you couldn't have known this... but still

Colt · 25 Nov 2004, 16:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

Namely your own