|
|
21 Oct 2004, 08:14
|
#1
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Interesting early average roid count
Average Roid Count for the T10
Ranked in order of score
LCH - 320
Absolute - 303
MISTU - 300
HR - 286
ND - 295
VGN - 280
WP - 257
VsN - 280
1up - 349
NoS - 275
Ranked in order of average roid count
1up - 349
LCH - 320
Absolute - 302
MISTU - 300
ND - 295
HR - 286
VGN - 280
VsN - 280
NoS - 275
WP - 257
This shows to me a few things
1) Even when not trying to win, 1up own all.
2) LCH have defenitely got a clear advantage over Absolute/MISTU.
3) ND/HR could well be battling again for a good finish, maybe top 3 after one of the current top 3 falters (or in the case of absolute, disbands )
4) WP need to get their arse in gear if they want to finish in their current high rank of 7th.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 09:11
|
#2
|
NE
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 828
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
yes.
__________________
PEACE.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 09:27
|
#3
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Wow. Roid average looks kind of crazy. Wp does seem to be slacking. I can see HR and ND fighting it out.
This early in the round 18 roids per member is way to big between LCH and Absolute.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 09:47
|
#4
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
This shows to me a few things
1) Even when not trying to win, 1up own all.
2) LCH have defenitely got a clear advantage over Absolute/MISTU.
3) ND/HR could well be battling again for a good finish, maybe top 3 after one of the current top 3 falters (or in the case of absolute, disbands )
4) WP need to get their arse in gear if they want to finish in their current high rank of 7th.
|
#1 is a crap statement. Who said they don't try to win? You think because they have less members that they will have less avg score because there is a smaller will to play well? They proved us last round that they can have great dedication and activity, I don't see how that would have changed suddenly.
I am however impressed by HR, seems they progress each round they play, which is a good thing.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 09:52
|
#5
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Hay, I remember when Assassin was boasting of his/thier roiding* "skills".
*initiation.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 10:04
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
heh, lol at Absolute, they are barely above the 300 roids that most of them initiated to
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 10:08
|
#7
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
heh, lol at Absolute, they are barely above the 300 roids that most of them initiated to
|
nonetheless better then everyone else but lch, 1up and mistu
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 10:26
|
#8
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Says more about the level of gaming atm, rather than Absolute though.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 10:35
|
#9
|
Evil has returned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: eta 4 from you
Posts: 384
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Thank you, thank you. First of all, I'd like to thank God for giving me the strength to roid everyday. I thank ViruS for being the first big alliance to give me a chance. Big props to Elysium for refining my skills in round 10 and last but not least, thanks to Mr Sid for allowing me to join this great group.
I will proudly accept this award, thank you!!
__________________
[ 1u p] WoW Player
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
LCH is too far away, now they are the same roid amout as 1up
|
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 11:03
|
#10
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzureWrath
Thank you, thank you. First of all, I'd like to thank God for giving me the strength to roid everyday. I thank ViruS for being the first big alliance to give me a chance. Big props to Elysium for refining my skills in round 10 and last but not least, thanks to Mr Sid for allowing me to join this great group.
I will proudly accept this award, thank you!!
|
The award will be handed to you once you've made a decent avatar
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 11:22
|
#11
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzureWrath
Thank you, thank you. First of all, I'd like to thank God for giving me the strength to roid everyday. I thank ViruS for being the first big alliance to give me a chance. Big props to Elysium for refining my skills in round 10 and last but not least, thanks to Mr Sid for allowing me to join this great group.
I will proudly accept this award, thank you!!
|
Hehe. /Me appluades AzureWrath. Bravo Bravo.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 11:26
|
#12
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Wow 350 roids at the beginning what a good indication of who's going to win?
Although to be honest it is kind of taken that 1up will win \o/
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 13:42
|
#13
|
Vitriolic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: #public
Posts: 1,506
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
As Sid has made it very clear I will only make a small reiteration of 1ups plans for the coming round.
We will not be playing for the top spot. We will, however, be playing as Kingmakers.
__________________
Chief [ 1up] Chimp.
<@JBG> by the way is mazzelaar a community account that everyone in 1up logs into when they're feeling angry?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGood
mazzelaar has always reminded me of a hungry hungry hippo. Except instead of eating marbles he just bites the heads off new AD posters
|
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 14:37
|
#14
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
So Mistu to Win then : |
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 15:07
|
#15
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Just my guess as to who you will be Kingmaking
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 15:24
|
#16
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
It`s silly to expect 1up to win. But one can assume, the other top5 alliances will probbly mass-attack us to remove our "threat" and just bottom feed more, as they are reluctant to hit each other, with the distinct possibility that the other alliances are actually even in numbers thus a possibilty of losing is present.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 15:48
|
#17
|
etc.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Taken.
Posts: 1,602
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Remember a time when "it didn't matter in the beginning, what mattered were the 'finishing moves'"?
__________________
10/20/04 <Dinoman> babies are like a online game... u wery soon get lack of sleep... and u try give em diffrent skills... it allso kills ur social life
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 16:39
|
#18
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
It`s silly to expect 1up to win. But one can assume, the other top5 alliances will probbly mass-attack us to remove our "threat" and just bottom feed more, as they are reluctant to hit each other, with the distinct possibility that the other alliances are actually even in numbers thus a possibilty of losing is present.
|
heh, tell me a round (in the past 6-7 rounds) where the winner of the round before didn't get ganked? 1up is no special and will be no different. So like ... don't act like pple will give you guys a special treatement.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 16:45
|
#19
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
heh, tell me a round (in the past 6-7 rounds) where the winner of the round before didn't get ganked? 1up is no special and will be no different. So like ... don't act like pple will give you guys a special treatement.
|
weren`t you the one going on and on about how FAnG got "extra incoming than any other ally" because they were the almighty winners of r10.5 ?:)
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 16:51
|
#20
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
weren`t you the one going on and on about how FAnG got "extra incoming than any other ally" because they were the almighty winners of r10.5 ?
|
thx for proving my point
yes I said we'd have extra incomming and (lemme tell you a secret...) WE DID ... !!!!
wow, great isn't it, it's like erm .... exactly what I said, not? Where exactly did I say it was sprecial treatement? I said we'd get more as round winners just as 1up "might" expect the same this round.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 16:56
|
#21
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Maybe for once, if an alliance ie. Absolute or MISTU wants to actually displace LCH, they might want to change that sequence.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 17:04
|
#22
|
Evil has returned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: eta 4 from you
Posts: 384
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
So Mistu to Win then : |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
Just my guess as to who you will be Kingmaking
|
What makes you think that exactly?
__________________
[ 1u p] WoW Player
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
LCH is too far away, now they are the same roid amout as 1up
|
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 17:33
|
#23
|
Evil has returned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: eta 4 from you
Posts: 384
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Tick 187:
Average Roid Count For The Top 10
Ranked in order of Total Score:
LCH - 331
MISTU - 314
Absolute - 301
HR - 305
ND - 315
VGN - 285
1up - 382
VsN - 293
NoS - 288
Ranked in order of average roid count
1up - 382
LCH - 331
ND - 315
MISTU - 314
HR - 305
Absolute - 301
VsN - 293
NoS - 288
VGN - 285
WP - 274
couple points to note:
Absolute has a slight, almost nonexistent lower avg roidcount than original post by Fish (303->301), while everyone else has risen.
Absolute also lost a rank (2nd->3rd)
Wolfpack gained a rank (7th->6th)
Vengeance lost a rank (6th->7th)
1up gained a rank (9th->8th)
VisioN lost a rank (8th->9th)
I trust all my info is correct
__________________
[ 1u p] WoW Player
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
LCH is too far away, now they are the same roid amout as 1up
|
Last edited by AzureWrath; 21 Oct 2004 at 17:43.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 17:38
|
#24
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Absolute have got an almost unrealistically low roid count. Is this perhaps some cunning ploy designed to ensure they're not nailed by the other alliances allowing them to emerge from the ashes of the inevitable war as the only alliance with ships and enthusiastic members left?
Or are they really just pants?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 18:01
|
#25
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
It`s plausible they only roid if their HCT level allows them to mine the extra roids and they may all actually be on HCT3 and 300 roids !
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 19:33
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
It`s plausible they only roid if their HCT level allows them to mine the extra roids and they may all actually be on HCT3 and 300 roids !
|
that would just be silly, since there isn't much penalty for having more roids than you can mine. I vote for ineffective Absolute military command and/or noobish players who dont like to attack.
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 20:12
|
#27
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Maybe they believe the game doesn`t let you "cap" roids you can`t mine
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 22:17
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 369
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
nope absolute had a bunch of members that started PA late so some were still initiating
__________________
r1 ??:??:?? Phalanx_WLF of Kadan
r2 9:23:1 Axis_WLF of Kadan : Blluetuba/Legion
r3 6:24:1 Axis_WLF of kadan : Legion/WolfPack
r4 201:15:1 Octavian of Ostia : Wolfpack
r5 13:6:2 Sun Tzu of Art of War : Legion Command
r6 33:13:?? : Legion Command
r7 15:19:12 Unknown soldier run over by a wagon : Legion Command
R8: 28:8:9 Niccolo Machiavelli of Revera Legatus : TITAN COMMAND BC
R12 ??:??:?? 1up Military Officer
|
|
|
21 Oct 2004, 23:00
|
#29
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
that would just be silly, since there isn't much penalty for having more roids than you can mine. I vote for ineffective Absolute military command and/or noobish players who dont like to attack.
|
funny how you think you're even remotely more skilled then the avg Absolute member. Remember that most of their members come from ALL DIFFERENT alliances such as Elysium, Eclipse, FAnG, WP, Dragons, ...
Some were probably your alliance m8's at some point. Nice to how big your head has grown since then I guess ...
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 00:45
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
funny how you think you're even remotely more skilled then the avg Absolute member. Remember that most of their members come from ALL DIFFERENT alliances such as Elysium, Eclipse, FAnG, WP, Dragons, ...
Some were probably your alliance m8's at some point. Nice to how big your head has grown since then I guess ...
|
Kjeldoran, I never said I was better than them, all I said was that they either are being quite ineffective in running attacks....or that they have lots of people that aren't interested in attacks, since they haven't grown in roids, in fact lost roids, recently. In summary, you know shit about me Kjeldoran, so f*ck off.
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 02:36
|
#31
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzureWrath
What makes you think that exactly?
|
I got siddy tied around my finger
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 11:54
|
#32
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
Kjeldoran, I never said I was better than them, all I said was that they either are being quite ineffective in running attacks....or that they have lots of people that aren't interested in attacks, since they haven't grown in roids, in fact lost roids, recently. In summary, you know shit about me Kjeldoran, so f*ck off.
|
ohh well NEWSFLASH !!! Not growing in roids is not always to blame on ineffective military command but mmm I dunno, because they get ganked and thus lose more roids then they gain?
Yet you assumed, it's Absolute so they MUST have a bad command, that's what you posted.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 12:31
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 475
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Don't listen to Kjel, he just get's frustrated because of his 'size'.
Leave the real people alone Kjel!
__________________
Still not banned wtf!??
-Lord Dain
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 12:32
|
#34
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackal2112
Don't listen to Kjel, he just get's frustrated because of his 'size'.
Leave the real people alone Kjel!
|
yeah it's hard, need to wear large boxers just to contain it
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 13:25
|
#35
|
Guest
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
i would say that our avg. roid count is because our commanding ppl knows what to do.
every1 was ordered to stop initiating below 250 roids.
our alliance have got some big gal attacks, and deffing is first priority as every1 knows.
so the outcome is that we have deffed ourselfs, and in same time average member of absolute has got 50 roids in attacks. calculate that.
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 13:54
|
#36
|
Paranoid Android
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hell
Posts: 409
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
*gets out calculator
*punches some buttons
nope still dont get it.
__________________
God loves his children
[SiN]
Safety in Numbers
NEVER AGAIN! Retired
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 15:02
|
#37
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by cujo
i would say that our avg. roid count is because our commanding ppl knows what to do.
every1 was ordered to stop initiating below 250 roids.
our alliance have got some big gal attacks, and deffing is first priority as every1 knows.
so the outcome is that we have deffed ourselfs, and in same time average member of absolute has got 50 roids in attacks. calculate that.
|
I see you just came back. Go ask a proper alliance representative for permission before you post something like this again.
The competion is initiating to at least 275-300. Why start your entire alliance down 25-30 roids. I did the calculations. It adds up to phewy.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 15:55
|
#38
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
You`ve managed one attack in this much time ?!
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 16:19
|
#39
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
People are initiating to 300 roids?!
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 16:26
|
#40
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Actually there was a couple of planets who initiated to 400 roids too I noticed <3.
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 17:28
|
#41
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
initiated to 400?!?! 300 was the perfect number to initiate to.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 17:29
|
#42
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Hay, who am i to question their tactics, easy roids is.. easy roids
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 17:37
|
#43
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Not initiating to 300 roids is stupidity if you play Cathaar.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 17:55
|
#44
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Back Porch Bar
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
I guess that explains why so many roidfat planets had no fleets.
Thanks for the free rocks, suckers! :P
__________________
I'd rather be fishing.
Utterly useless since r3
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 21:27
|
#45
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
ohh well NEWSFLASH !!! Not growing in roids is not always to blame on ineffective military command but mmm I dunno, because they get ganked and thus lose more roids then they gain?
Yet you assumed, it's Absolute so they MUST have a bad command, that's what you posted.
|
A) 1up last round had way more incoming all the time than what Absolute is facing right now, yet we managed *almost* all the time to still gain a sizeable amount of roids more than we lost.
B) Defense aside, if they cant steal more roids at the start of the round than they lose, while every other alliance is blowing by them, that is ineffective military command and/or members not attacking smartly.
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 21:47
|
#46
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shev
Not initiating to 300 roids is stupidity if you play Cathaar.
|
Dont scream too soon.
If you play cathaar with the intent of getting CR as fast as possible, you cant do HCT3 before protection ends, cos you need to rush for Siege Weapons. And with the ability to mine only 200 roids, initing to 300 is in fact stupidity.
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
22 Oct 2004, 21:54
|
#47
|
Evil has returned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: eta 4 from you
Posts: 384
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRat
Dont scream too soon.
If you play cathaar with the intent of getting CR as fast as possible, you cant do HCT3 before protection ends, cos you need to rush for Siege Weapons. And with the ability to mine only 200 roids, initing to 300 is in fact stupidity.
|
so most of them are cath?
__________________
[ 1u p] WoW Player
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
LCH is too far away, now they are the same roid amout as 1up
|
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 03:54
|
#48
|
NE
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 828
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
update roid count i wanna see
__________________
PEACE.
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 03:57
|
#49
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRat
Dont scream too soon.
If you play cathaar with the intent of getting CR as fast as possible, you cant do HCT3 before protection ends, cos you need to rush for Siege Weapons. And with the ability to mine only 200 roids, initing to 300 is in fact stupidity.
|
Then use the frigates for the first couple of attacks and be slower to CR. Xan especially are vulnerable to frigates in the early stages.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 04:41
|
#50
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: Interesting early average roid count
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochese
I guess that explains why so many roidfat planets had no fleets.
Thanks for the free rocks, suckers! :P
|
I init'd to 300 ... noone touched me.
It was the 'proper' move, anything else was just stubborn.
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04.
| |