|
23 Dec 2004, 14:21
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 110
|
Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
Would removing the Exchange of Resources and Trade be a
Good thing or a bad thing?
thoughts ?
Last edited by Troglodyte; 24 Dec 2004 at 09:19.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 15:16
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 386
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
a) so there's no skill involved now eh?
b) how would not relying on handouts encourage people to attack more? If they choose not to attack then that's their call
c) assuming that fuel is being returned next round? (haven't been around for a few days and haven't read up)
d) no
e) no
f) no
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 16:00
|
#3
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
i'm not sure how removing the option to trade causes any of your objectives?
-mist
__________________
<Karmulian> subtle as a kick in the nuts as always
|
|
|
23 Dec 2004, 16:54
|
#4
|
Ex-Head Multihunter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 900
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
i dont think removing trade has anything to do wiith any of the things you wrote.....
__________________
R02.0-R4.0: [noob]
R05.0: [Wrath]/[Fury]
R06.0: Quit after 1 week
R7-9: Had an account, but didnt play seriously
R09.5: []LCH[] Officer
R10.0: []LCH[] HC (Rank #9, #1 Gal)
R10.5-R18.0: []LCH[] HC Scanner!
R18.0-R33 : Multihunter, Head MH
R34-.. : [CT] HC
|
|
|
24 Dec 2004, 01:04
|
#5
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arbondigo
a) so there's no skill involved now eh?
|
Close to 0 skill needed
|
|
|
24 Dec 2004, 08:45
|
#6
|
the Sacred Pervert
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,492
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
skill based like what? like actually manually driving your ships with your keboard???
__________________
"....some might say, we will find a brighter day...."
-Oasis
Veneratio | Insomnia | F-Crew | Subh
|
|
|
24 Dec 2004, 13:09
|
#7
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
i think people were more refering to tactical decisions
-mist
__________________
<Karmulian> subtle as a kick in the nuts as always
|
|
|
25 Dec 2004, 15:12
|
#8
|
the Sacred Pervert
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,492
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mist
i think people were more refering to tactical decisions
-mist
|
actually, i posted this idea to a similar thread like this.. i think itd be really cool to be able to actually deploy ur defending fleets in certain points in space, like hide them behind asteroids and space debris and stuff and be able to ambush attacking fleets and stuff like that.. and also tactically ordering your attacking fleets on precisely how to attack a target, be it left or right flanks or charge.. separate your fleets in teams, then assign team 1 and 2 to left flank and team 3 to charge, 4 and 5 right flank, etc.. if this is the idea, then i think it should be done.. also when fleets are en-route to the target, create scans where the attacker would know how the defenders fleets are placed around his planet
__________________
"....some might say, we will find a brighter day...."
-Oasis
Veneratio | Insomnia | F-Crew | Subh
|
|
|
25 Dec 2004, 23:04
|
#9
|
Forever Noob
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 321
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
So defender always chooses best defensive position then, and it turns into pure luck intstead of tactics for attacker.
__________________
<Zhil> I order the immediate return of my property
<Zhil> No 1up member should steal from another
<[MO]Forest> no 1up should attcak a 1up gal without permission form hc
<Zhil> I am HC
<Zhil> I gave myself permission
<[MO]Forest> i meant a proper hc, not a hc who would suicide into his MO's fleet
Played r4-9.5 r12-14 Now retired.
Proud to have been Cosmic Frostbite (r12 - 22:5 - #1 gal)
Forever [4D] - LCH, ND, Absolute, TFD, DLR
Might and greed will never outweigh honor and loyalty!
|
|
|
26 Dec 2004, 00:19
|
#10
|
the Sacred Pervert
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,492
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion Treet
So defender always chooses best defensive position then, and it turns into pure luck intstead of tactics for attacker.
|
which brings back the old argument of the "cloaking" feature of xan ships that also supports a "luck" factor in battle - where cloaked ships cant be seen and/or not accurate on jumpgate probe scans, fleet scans are just NOT possible, and unit scans are way inaccurate - which now, directs the argument to where battles shouldnt last just one tick ---- and it goes on and on and on...
maybe this thread isnt even worth it anymore..
__________________
"....some might say, we will find a brighter day...."
-Oasis
Veneratio | Insomnia | F-Crew | Subh
|
|
|
27 Dec 2004, 18:59
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
I think it's complicated enough now. The pour n00bs (/me look at himself) would use days and nights understanding how to play if it gets even more complicated./
__________________
R: 4 not sure(IPC maybe) R5: Rock/Templar R6: NoS or something R7: FAnG R8: FAnG R9-12: Vac
eX ROCK/Templar
eX FAnG
*Comander of DreamTeam*
EvoL and Dream to tha Bone
|
|
|
30 Dec 2004, 18:35
|
#12
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 642
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
I like how you start one thread to make pa more skilled, and one to introduce random factors making it less skilled.
You++
__________________
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most
-Elysium Officer
[1up] Senior MO
Retired
|
|
|
11 Jan 2005, 20:35
|
#13
|
Inactive peon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
|
Re: Turn PA into a more skilled based game ?
pa shoudl of course require skill over activity but the ways suggested in the first post are not the right ways.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10.
| |