Reet

[G.K Zhukov]

BAD REALJAMES!!
You deleted both my nicks!

(memo to dreadidiot: none of them were Zhukov ofc)

[TehVader]

Oh noes, our spy have been discovered?

Norteh James!

[MrL_JaKiri]

Originally posted by Unf_Slasher
are you deliberatly misunderstanding my points????
1. states that LDK and DRAGONS banded together.
2. refutes that the opposition banded together

Originally posted by Unf_Slasher
erm, you missunderstood lei there,
1. ldk allied dragons first, before anyone else banded together

Looks like 1 states that everyone else banded together too.

Originally posted by Kjeldoran
ohh ffs, quit whining m8. Fact is, in PA both alliances can get to 150 players. So yes, it's fair a 1 vs 1, always. If needed you just massrecruit or dunno what.

rgds Kj

Why the hell are people arguing about whether 'PA is fair or not'?

My point was that political necessity changes as the situation in the round changes.

Do you deny that?

ps.

I don't have an alliance, so I'm not acting as propaganda for anyone.

[xtothez]

Originally posted by Unf_Slasher
ehm???
you might have a word with your intel sources about their reliability.

My source would be Kjel. I think him approaching me and Stress to talk about friendly FAnG/Ely relations qualifies in this case.

"heh"

[Provider]

Originally posted by lizardking
Your missing the point my friend..

The difference between Rah/Ely/Ecl/ToT and Ðragons/ND/Pack is the fact we (as Ðragons atleast) have nothing but denied these rumours the first thing they started to fly around. There is absolutely nothing to hide or to tell. So the real question is, why isn't "the other side" doing the same? I would guess that is because the trueth will come out eventually and they know everything they are claiming right now will have aftereffects and it would be a bad move to bury chances before claiming a decent status in the universe compared to other alliances as well as the hatred against blocking itself.

Then ofc, after there's some solid proove, those certain staff members of certain few alliances will come out to say "We never claimed we didn't ally each other. We were merely looking for the right time to make it official" ...with clear conscience ofc.

btw, Joe.. maybe it's time u change ur forums account.. this 1 is getting rather old already, don't u think?

Like I posted before. all they need to do is to deny it here. Altho... Eclipse did deny it in their membersmeeting according to a friend of mine. If they happen to have allied others already then they lied to their own members. I can't believe they would do this.

[Unf_Slasher]

Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
Looks like 1 states that everyone else banded together too.

erm no, before only states what action had happened before. it doesnt imply anything for what happened afterwards

[Unf_Slasher]

Originally posted by xtothez
My source would be Kjel. I think him approaching me and Stress to talk about friendly FAnG/Ely relations qualifies in this case.

"heh"

so approaching someone about the possibility of friendly relations in the future is the same as signing a nap??
interesting

[Razorback]

And what should ely have for "friendly" relations with fang ? if its not towards an alliance or a nap ?
Is that somekind of student exchange ? or maybe you show them your stamp collection ? or completely informal meetings for a tea ? pld etc.

[Unf_Slasher]

Originally posted by Razorback
And what should ely have for "friendly" relations with fang ? if its not towards an alliance or a nap ?
Is that somekind of student exchange ? or maybe you show them your stamp collection ? or completely informal meetings for a tea ? pld etc.

focht please, we've known each other long enough to know that that isnt what i meant.
Fact is what xtho said doesnt have the slightest bearing on our current diplomatic relations.
he doesnt have a clue if we are allied, the only thing he knows is that we arent allied to him.

him quoting a post of mine, concerning a completly different alliance, with a statement which has got nothing to do with the topic is simple provokation nothing more.

[Stress]

heh id drop the log, but its not my style

[Jorinn]

Originally posted by Stress
heh id drop the log, but its not my style

Oh, please do, it would amuse me no end, then everyone could compare the versions they have and we can go with the one that is most contentious and this rather entertaining thread will continue for longer.

[Kjeldoran]

Originally posted by Razorback
And what should ely have for "friendly" relations with fang ? if its not towards an alliance or a nap ?
Is that somekind of student exchange ? or maybe you show them your stamp collection ? or completely informal meetings for a tea ? pld etc.

lol, did you ever talk to a dragon, ely, tot, whatever alliance person? Yes, well then I guess your intentions were to nap them all ...

Your post makes no logics. We never had a meeting with ely even, I only pm'd Stress.

rgds Kj

[Barrow|Pony]

I Love You! Good Morning!

[MrL_JaKiri]

Originally posted by Unf_Slasher
erm no, before only states what action had happened before. it doesnt imply anything for what happened afterwards

Nothing can happen before an action that NEVER HAPPENED.

[TehVader]

Originally posted by Barrow|Pony
I Love You! Good Morning!

Seconded

[Razorback]

Originally posted by Kjeldoran
lol, did you ever talk to a dragon, ely, tot, whatever alliance person? Yes, well then I guess your intentions were to nap them all ...

Your post makes no logics. We never had a meeting with ely even, I only pm'd Stress.

rgds Kj

The point is the detail of talking about friendly relationships between 2 alliances rather then to have a chat with a buddy about god and the world. So you hardly can claim the discussion about friendly terms with an alliancehc who has not close personal ties to you is not a polticial move and is on the same level as a commandmember talking to a friend in another alliance about the weather .
about your pmings i think you can claim you never had a meeting with ToT or Eclipse either yet you asked for a political deal for r10 and what our opinions on Fang were like you said yourself. So infact your "pms" can be more then just a "lo how is the weather".

[xtothez]

Originally posted by Kjeldoran
lol, did you ever talk to a dragon, ely, tot, whatever alliance person? Yes, well then I guess your intentions were to nap them all ...

You didn't get my point. I'm not flaming the fact you talk to other alliances, I'm highlighting the fact your fellow HC just embarassed you by writing this:

Originally posted by Unf_Slasher
just shows that people who block this early, arent confident in their alliance.

only weeks after your attempted to do the same, but were rejected.

This AD lark is too easy.

[Kjeldoran]

Originally posted by Razorback
The point is the detail of talking about friendly relationships between 2 alliances rather then to have a chat with a buddy about god and the world. So you hardly can claim the discussion about friendly terms with an alliancehc who has not close personal ties to you is not a polticial move and is on the same level as a commandmember talking to a friend in another alliance about the weather .
about your pmings i think you can claim you never had a meeting with ToT or Eclipse either yet you asked for a political deal for r10 and what our opinions on Fang were like you said yourself. So infact your "pms" can be more then just a "lo how is the weather".

first of all, let's be sure that both eclipse as tot wanted relations aswell, hence why they offered a nap which we refused, so don't make it look like it was only FAnG who was interested.
And if you've forgotten, I've been a member of elysium for 1 round so I might be closer to them then an avg person.

Ask Stress if you like, we got exactly 1 pm which was hardly official nor even "interesting". We just shared what our future plans might be, that's all.

rgds Kj

[Unf_Slasher]

Originally posted by xtothez

only weeks after your attempted to do the same, but were rejected.

This AD lark is too easy.

first of my personal opinion is excactly that personal.
i have had that opinion since rd 3 to be precise, in rd 9.5 it happened and we got our ass kicked by dragons and ldk.

second as kj says, its hardly what you call official negotiations.
if we wanted to block we could have taken the naps eclipse and tot offered, and now with our back protected we could be taking apart your alliance.

but we didnt, we are still waiting for moves from other alliances.

now get down from your high horse Mr.

[HobbieRogue4]

Originally posted by The_Fish
ND are solo, and will not be blocking this round unless forced into it. (:

I am left dumbfounded by this.

[Lei~]

i find this thread very amusing and hope it carries on
but i think theres not enough new energy in the rumour making industry so i thought about which other possible allies there could be for the mega eet block and whilst thinking i thought wolfpack could help it a big deal....
especially the name: weet...
now tot would only have to change their name a lil for the round and wed have a cool block name

also i thank slash for brightening out the lil difficulties that seemed to have existed with my post dint find it that hard to understand tho

ps when do i get rid of this stupid ensign thingy?

[xtothez]

Originally posted by Lei~
ps when do i get rid of this stupid ensign thingy?

http://pirate.planetarion.com/member...on=editprofile

[RealJames]

Originally posted by G.K Zhukov
BAD REALJAMES!!
You deleted both my nicks!

(memo to dreadidiot: none of them were Zhukov ofc)

Hate me, I'll still sleep.

Originally posted by TehVader
Oh noes, our spy have been discovered?

Norteh James!

Sorry matey.

[Mikee]

Originally posted by xtothez
My source would be Kjel. I think him approaching me and Stress to talk about friendly FAnG/Ely relations qualifies in this case.

"heh"

thats like saying Maddix and Empress will have beautiful children
:eek:

wehheheee xtothefags got a promotion so who r u gonna snitch on next ? whats ur next promotion gonna be to then ?



P.S Psi im disappointed in u of all the alliances in the universe u joined Elysium

[TehVader]

Originally posted by RealJames
Hate me, I'll still sleep.
Sorry matey.

You sleep? Amazing.

And it's np, I'll just send Zhukov in undercover again, he's like the best spy evar!!!12

[RealJames]

Originally posted by TehVader
You sleep? Amazing.

A full 25 minutes last night.

Originally posted by TehVader
And it's np, I'll just send Zhukov in undercover again, he's like the best spy evar!!!12

He's very good at disguising his talents.

[G.K Zhukov]

Originally posted by TehVader
You sleep? Amazing.

And it's np, I'll just send Zhukov in undercover again, he's like the best spy evar!!!12

*music* To the rescue, here I am *music*

[TehVader]

Originally posted by RealJames
A full 25 minutes last night.
He's very good at disguising his talents.

25 eh, not bad. If you keep it up you might get the equilant (sp?) of a decent nights sleep soon

And yeh, he was trained by the very best. Hide in plain sight etc

[Fyodor]

Looks like eet really does exist....... so all of you who thought so were right...

[Lei~]

now lets wait for something official as its obvious now

[Storebo]

Originally posted by Morden
Take comfort in the fact that:
WTFVE was a rumour in r5
FLTV,FoS and Xeta were rumours in r6
FLTTVV and NEWX were rumours in r7
weetnar was a rumour in r9.

Rumours in pa tend to have a large basis in fact unless you havent noticed.

Got to trust what FAnG military command tells yah, surely they have nothing to gain on others wanting to ally them as the "oposition" =/

[Morden]

Originally posted by Storebo
Got to trust what FAnG military command tells yah, surely they have nothing to gain on others wanting to ally them as the "oposition" =/

Ever thought of being a comedian? You'd make a hell of a lot of money, I mean damn I laugh at you every time you post.

On a more serious note, dont you find it rather ironic and hypocrytical that your claiming that your now doing the exact same thing as us? except of course that we had a few more facts and a bit more evidence.

ps: You appear to think 2 Vs 3 is unfair for the Block of 3, I suggest you go back to school and study childrens Maths, you know the one for 5-7 year olds, might help you a bit when doing basic maths.

[Zh|l]

A well tailored rumour is more dangerous than any attacks ingame.

Just to note, Morden is actually incorrect in saying that rumours always had a basis in fact. There were plenty of rumours throughout PA history that had little to no basis and were only based upon the dreams of other people.

[JonnyBGood]

Originally posted by Zh|l
A well tailored rumour is more dangerous than any attacks ingame.

Just to note, Morden is actually incorrect in saying that rumours always had a basis in fact. There were plenty of rumours throughout PA history that had little to no basis and were only based upon the dreams of other people.

Judging by the sentiments expressed by people on both supposed sides towards the other one imagines that, as with all great rumours, there is some substance to the rumour. (Or perhaps every alliance really is going solo heh).

[Zh|l]

Originally posted by JonnyBGood
Judging by the sentiments expressed by people on both supposed sides towards the other one imagines that, as with all great rumours, there is some substance to the rumour. (Or perhaps every alliance really is going solo heh).

Couldnt really care less.

He worded it in a way to say there is a basis of fact behind rumours, which is untrue. Most rumours start up on no basis at all apart from the 'word' of someone.

[Morden]

Originally posted by Zh|l
A well tailored rumour is more dangerous than any attacks ingame.

Just to note, Morden is actually incorrect in saying that rumours always had a basis in fact. There were plenty of rumours throughout PA history that had little to no basis and were only based upon the dreams of other people.

I did not say they always had basis in fact. I said they often did.

Which is correct, afterall if I spread a rumour about Alliance B, just by writing there name correctly there is a basis of fact.

[TheShadowMan]

who cares

[Morden]

Originally posted by TheShadowMan
who cares

You obviously do or you wouldnt have posted.

Now fark off and stop wasting bandwidth.

[ronnie]

Originally posted by Zh|l
He worded it in a way to say there is a basis of fact behind rumours, which is untrue.

theres no smoke without fire ?

[KinGSmity]

Originally posted by ronnie
theres no smoke without fire ?

Pigs Fly Over the Moon?

[RealJames]

Originally posted by Morden
You obviously do or you wouldnt have posted.

Now fark off and stop wasting bandwidth.

hehe