|
20 Mar 2005, 15:18
|
#1
|
U've been Moderated
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: getting sex0red by pretty women
Posts: 1,510
|
[Declined] Gc
how about giving that are placed in buddy packs 2 votes per person instead of 1, so it's easier to get a gc and ministers in place incase the randoms don't vote or all vote on themselves...?
would probably help galaxies who have alot of inactives
__________________
Titans forever and ever.
<Forest> i fuc*ing hate password sharers, i will log into macs bros account and get scans every 2 mins
<Tempestuous> cypher just happens to be the world's cutest creature
|
|
|
20 Mar 2005, 15:22
|
#2
|
deserves a medal
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,211
|
Re: Gc
what about the payed randoms then they should get an extra vote 2.....
either way.. I like the idea..
__________________
"I have with me two gods, Persuasion and Compulsion."
|
|
|
20 Mar 2005, 20:25
|
#3
|
Filtheh
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 186
|
Re: Gc
i suppose its another incentive to upgrade ur account. more political/voting power within...your galaxy....
__________________
[G-II] [VsN] []LCH[] [Reunion] [eXilition] [Subh] [1up] [Angels] [Jenova] [p3nguins]
Last edited by Filth; 21 Mar 2005 at 18:27.
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 07:24
|
#4
|
Take that
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
Re: Gc
yeah paid accounts more voting power makes sense...
__________________
yeah ok dudes i dont need your memoirs...
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 17:41
|
#5
|
There is a better answer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 247
|
Re: Gc
More voting power for paid accounts - I like it.
__________________
Conall - Rds 2-5, 11-?
I am Still.......
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.
Sir Winston Churchill
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 22:50
|
#6
|
Aria's TeddyBear :p
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 516
|
Re: Gc
but this would make an inbalance in some gals that have unpaid randoms. They want there equal chance. some people either can't or don't want to pay right away. why should we damper there political say in there galaxy.
__________________
Proud to be have been Fyre, NewDawn, NoS - The Illuminati, [ 1u p]
R3 [Acid] peon
R4 - R7 [Fyre] HC
R7 - R8 [ND] HC
R8 - R13 [NoS] MC
R14 - R16 [ 1u p] MO
R17 Retired
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 22:54
|
#7
|
Filtheh
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 186
|
Re: Gc
the inbalance already exists between paid and unpaid planets, this is just an extra incentive to upgrade your account and it solves cyphers original problem/suggestion
"so it's easier to get a gc and ministers in place incase the randoms don't vote or all vote on themselves...?"
__________________
[G-II] [VsN] []LCH[] [Reunion] [eXilition] [Subh] [1up] [Angels] [Jenova] [p3nguins]
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 23:03
|
#8
|
Aria's TeddyBear :p
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 516
|
Re: Gc
would that be best to have
gc = (votes/total_voted) >50%
not
gc = (votes/gal_members) >50%
__________________
Proud to be have been Fyre, NewDawn, NoS - The Illuminati, [ 1u p]
R3 [Acid] peon
R4 - R7 [Fyre] HC
R7 - R8 [ND] HC
R8 - R13 [NoS] MC
R14 - R16 [ 1u p] MO
R17 Retired
|
|
|
21 Mar 2005, 23:06
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: Gc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doorsdown
would that be best to have
gc = (votes/total_voted) >50%
|
The current formula is:
gc = most votes, default vote = blank.
|
|
|
22 Mar 2005, 03:02
|
#10
|
Aria's TeddyBear :p
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 516
|
Re: Gc
ya so there is no point to this cause if they don't vote it doesn't matter
__________________
Proud to be have been Fyre, NewDawn, NoS - The Illuminati, [ 1u p]
R3 [Acid] peon
R4 - R7 [Fyre] HC
R7 - R8 [ND] HC
R8 - R13 [NoS] MC
R14 - R16 [ 1u p] MO
R17 Retired
|
|
|
24 Mar 2005, 00:07
|
#11
|
Inactive peon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
|
Re: Gc
declined
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06.
| |