 |
15 Jun 2004, 23:01
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3
|
Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
Any chance this can happen? It would benefit everyone, and everyone would start out on same terms. The way it is now, gals with no inactives have a huge advantage compared to the gals with 2-3 inactives in.
|
|
|
|
15 Jun 2004, 23:04
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
Oh, and the buddies shouldn't be split ofc.
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 07:43
|
#3
|
|
#SiN
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 19
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
I think 3 days to move inactives maybe a little soon. We do need more memebers and that could maybe scare some of them off. I do think that 14 days before delection of inactive free acconts is to long though. Maybe change that to 7 or 5 would be great.
__________________
#SiN
Safety in Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 15:42
|
#4
|
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
Inactives should be quarantined from the regular universe; put them in their own galaxies or clusters until they're deleted. If they become active then move them back into the regular universe. If you quarantine them, then all the 3-days-is-too-short, 14-days-is-too-long issues are largely moot.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 16:13
|
#5
|
|
Winker
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: IOW
Posts: 319
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tactitus
Inactives should be quarantined from the regular universe; put them in their own galaxies or clusters until they're deleted. If they become active then move them back into the regular universe. If you quarantine them, then all the 3-days-is-too-short, 14-days-is-too-long issues are largely moot.
|
AMEN to that
__________________
prestel
Yeah so what Im an Original Pr0nstar
some of us have serious jobs
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 19:08
|
#6
|
|
Lost the Fury... :(
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 516
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
As was suggested by several people long ago... there should be paid gals and unpaid gals... any other way is just unfair to those paid players who get stuck in a gal with 5-6 unpaid ones, and have to fight gals full of paid players or spend weeks trying to exile until they get decent gals.
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 21:04
|
#7
|
|
l337 Beyond Repair
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
what planetarion needs is to have seperate universes.. paid and unpaid, where the unpaid universe doesnt have alliances and a few other things
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 21:47
|
#8
|
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
I believe the problem under discussion here is inactive accounts; not unpaid accounts. 
Segregating unpaid accounts--especially without doing something about inactive accounts--would eliminate much of the value in the 'free trial' concept as new players will see only a 'dead' galaxy and have little incentive to upgrade to a paid account.
Of the many problems in PA, I think inactive accounts are a far bigger problem than unpaid accounts.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
|
|
16 Jun 2004, 23:53
|
#9
|
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
i dunno, inactive accounts cost jolt nothing :P
-mist
|
|
|
|
|
17 Jun 2004, 00:01
|
#10
|
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mist
i dunno, inactive accounts cost jolt nothing :P
|
Just customers. :/
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
|
|
17 Jun 2004, 00:20
|
#11
|
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: Remove inactives and shuffle at tick 72 ?
i soooo shouldn't comment on that :P
-mist
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:49.
| |
Linear Mode
