|
9 Jul 2003, 19:52
|
#1
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Physics Question
Pretty simple really.
Q: To what degree does g vary from place to place on earth, and am I right in claiming that that variation could be a limiting factor in determining the mass of objects using a standard digital lab scale?
We've got one that reads out to four decimal places, and while I think that's fine for getting ratios, I don't think all four can be used for mass. Which is confusing because it reads in grams and grams are a mass unit.
|
|
|
9 Jul 2003, 20:00
|
#2
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
Correct. I hear g at the pole is approx 1.004 times g at the equator. But those scales have that "TARE" facility to calibrate.
|
|
|
9 Jul 2003, 20:01
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 98
|
I don't think the variance would be significant to worry about (unless you really require the precision), but I think a balance scale would be better way to determine mass.
sorry, I know it's not really what you are asking -it's been a few too many years since my physics classes
|
|
|
9 Jul 2003, 20:02
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 118
|
ok this is prolly 100% wrong but it is an educated guess. you must remeber i dotn do degree or A level science i have only done GCSE science/physics and i got A* for it.
the answer to your question to my knowlage is this
the varyation of graity is a very slight varyation and is only differnet on hig and low areas IE brimingam england has stronger gravity than that on the top of mount snowden in wales(if i have my geograhy right) the avrage gravity is 10newtons. the closer to the core of the earth the stronger gravity is. and also if the earht span faster by some fluke of nature gravity woud increase or if the earth grew bigger. there are differnt variables that can cause gravitations rise and fall. the mass of a planet is one and the speed at which it rotatse is the other.
i must warn you this is a GCSE level answer and prolly not what you are looking for. im sure there is soemone doing a degree here that will make my answer correct or atleast expand on it and correct any mistakes if any in my answer
|
|
|
9 Jul 2003, 20:04
|
#5
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Quote:
Originally posted by queball
Correct. I hear g at the pole is approx 1.004 times g at the equator. But those scales have that "TARE" facility to calibrate.
|
doesn't tare just shift the 0 point?
hmmm. i guess there's a long calibration right after you've turned it on when it could be running a test weight of known value.
|
|
|
9 Jul 2003, 20:04
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 118
|
wow there were 2 posts between the point of me thinking and writeing out my post.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 07:48
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by warrmr
the closer to the core of the earth the stronger gravity is.
and also if the earht span faster by some fluke of nature gravity woud increase.
|
you got an A*???
Oh. My. God.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 07:50
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
incidentally, it would vary slightly, but I couldn't quantify it for you.
It will probably be a very small bit of a fraction of a percent though.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 08:11
|
#9
|
Unreregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
you got an A*???
Oh. My. God.
|
dont be mean to the young chap
__________________
I have been unbanned.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 08:12
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kumnaa
dont be mean to the young chap
|
it's not him that is the problem, it's the state of our education.
back when I were a lad, I would get beaten to near death with a pair of hobnail boots for saying such a thing.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 08:24
|
#11
|
Unreregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
it's not him that is the problem, it's the state of our education.
back when I were a lad, I would get beaten to near death with a pair of hobnail boots for saying such a thing.
|
Im pretty sure that was the level of exams for GCSE when I were a lad 7 odd years ago. We were taught to a higher standard but the exams were pretty damn simple.
__________________
I have been unbanned.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 09:59
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
you got an A*???
Oh. My. God.
|
yes i did and that was at GCSE level as i said i didnt do A or degree level therfore the answer is prolly not that accurate
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 10:10
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kumnaa
the exams were pretty damn simple.
|
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 11:17
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wearing Speedos
Posts: 1,021
|
Depends on what the objects you are weighing are and the accuracy of the scales?
For example if the objects were paper, or anything hydroscopic, you would have to make sure the conditions at point A and Point B were the same temperature and humidity.
As you will see the paper's properties changing as they absorb or loose moisture based on the surrounding conditions.
The accuracy of the lab scales i use are calibrated to UKAS class 0.5 at three decimal places.
If i use these scales i'm sure the inheriant variation in the scales would not be accurate enough.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 11:21
|
#15
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Gravity is the same everywhere in the universe.
(P.S. Pi is exactly three.)
__________________
Please bear in mind when reading the above post that I am always right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson
He was crowned in York Cathedral as 'Expert in the West' by Pope Urban III in 1186.
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 11:24
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
Gravity is the same everywhere in the universe.
(P.S. Pi is exactly three.)
|
are you getting all biblical on me now?
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 11:25
|
#17
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
are you getting all biblical on me now?
|
If there were no gravity in space, God's beard would flap around all over the place.
__________________
Please bear in mind when reading the above post that I am always right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson
He was crowned in York Cathedral as 'Expert in the West' by Pope Urban III in 1186.
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:34
|
#18
|
Bored
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nottm ->Shef ->Croydon ->Manc ->Durham ->Sheffield
Posts: 6,506
|
F = GMm/r^2
F-Force
G-constant
M-mass of object with gravitational field
m-mass of object having gravitational field acting on it
r-distance between centres of objects
As F = ma (gravity is an acceleration)
g = GM/r^2
therefore you can see that it does differ where you are on the earth but the change in r is so small it will rarely affect g.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:41
|
#19
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:45
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
If there were no gravity in space, God's beard would flap around all over the place.
|
heh, next it will be turtles all the way down.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:46
|
#21
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Tare cannot possibly compensate for the effect of change in force due to differing gravitational fields on a set mass. Like acropolis said, it basically shifts zero on a linear scale.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:47
|
#22
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
If there were no gravity in space, God's beard would flap around all over the place.
|
No it wouldn't because God is a gas, you ignorant fool.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:49
|
#23
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sayonara
No it wouldn't because God is a gas, you ignorant fool.
|
2 Kings 4:19 says he's an old man with a beard.
__________________
Please bear in mind when reading the above post that I am always right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson
He was crowned in York Cathedral as 'Expert in the West' by Pope Urban III in 1186.
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:53
|
#24
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sayonara
Tare cannot possibly compensate for the effect of change in force due to differing gravitational fields on a set mass. Like acropolis said, it basically shifts zero on a linear scale.
|
Yeah, ok. Cos it's used to measure additional weight in a test-tube and stuff. I dunno then.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:54
|
#25
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
2 Kings 4:19 says he's an old man with a beard.
|
Lies
God is a gas.
How else can he be everywhere?
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:55
|
#26
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sayonara
Lies
God is a gas.
How else can he be everywhere?
|
He's very big.
__________________
Please bear in mind when reading the above post that I am always right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson
He was crowned in York Cathedral as 'Expert in the West' by Pope Urban III in 1186.
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:58
|
#27
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
He's very big.
|
But that means if there's gravity his beard will get pulled towards the center of his body.
Clearly god is a gas. A really really really diffuse blob of gas that fills the universe.
That's how there can be other things in the same space.
You obviously don't know anything about modern physics.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 12:59
|
#28
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sayonara
But that means if there's gravity his beard will get pulled towards the center of his body.
|
Gravity always pulls downwards.
__________________
Please bear in mind when reading the above post that I am always right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Manson
He was crowned in York Cathedral as 'Expert in the West' by Pope Urban III in 1186.
|
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 13:00
|
#29
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
Gravity always pulls downwards.
|
lol
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 13:04
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
Gravity always pulls downwards.
|
the tragedy is, I see arguments like this on a christian forum I frequent.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 13:14
|
#31
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wearing Speedos
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
the tragedy is, I see arguments like this on a christian forum I frequent.
|
Please provide linkage!
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 13:23
|
#32
|
Unreregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
the tragedy is, I see arguments like this on a christian forum I frequent.
|
why do you frequent a christian forum ?
__________________
I have been unbanned.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 13:26
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kumnaa
why do you frequent a christian forum ?
|
debate. there isn't enough of it here anymore, so I thought I would find a bunch of people who I held a diametrically opposite viewpoint to.
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 14:09
|
#34
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sayonara
Tare cannot possibly compensate for the effect of change in force due to differing gravitational fields on a set mass. Like acropolis said, it basically shifts zero on a linear scale.
|
But if there was something inside that had been premeasured to be exactly 100 grams, and it automatically measured that whenever the scale was turned on, and set 100 grams to the 100 gram and 0 to the 0...I just have doubts that that is how they do it.
If not, then in absolute terms our 4-digit scale is only good (in absolute terms out to the 2nd significant figure. Pretty crap really.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 14:23
|
#35
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
What you need is a nice precise block of, say, platinum kept at constant temperature.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 15:00
|
#36
|
Gubbish
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: #FoW
Posts: 2,323
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
But if there was something inside that had been premeasured to be exactly 100 grams, and it automatically measured that whenever the scale was turned on, and set 100 grams to the 100 gram and 0 to the 0...I just have doubts that that is how they do it.
If not, then in absolute terms our 4-digit scale is only good (in absolute terms out to the 2nd significant figure. Pretty crap really.
|
You'd need two control weights to find out what of the error is in a differing g and what by additional mass in the mechanism or container.
__________________
Gubble gubble gubble gubble
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 15:11
|
#37
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by W
You'd need two control weights to find out what of the error is in a differing g and what by additional mass in the mechanism or container.
|
This is starting to sound dangerously like hard work.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2003, 15:15
|
#38
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Just have exactly one mole of carbon 12.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:12.
| |