Round 54 Predictions

[Androme]

1) Top 10 Planets - Alliance %

My prediction: 5% Vikings - 30% Apprime - 25% ND - 20% Conspiracy - 10% HR


2) Top 5 Alliances

My prediction: #1 Conspiracy - #2 Apprime - #3 NewDawn - #4 Vikings - #5 HR

3) Most NAP'd Alliance

My prediction: Vikings

4) Most Attacked Alliance

My prediction: FAGn

5) Most Played Race

My prediction: Etd/Zik

[Kaiba]

1) 25% Apprime 20% Vikings 15% CT 15% FanG 10% ND 5% Misc

2) 1. Vikings 2. Fallen 3. CT 4. Apprime 5. ND

3) NewDawn

4) Vikings

5) Etd/Ter (playing BS mainly) least used will be Xan

[Hunterrrr]

1. Immortals
2. Vikings
3. Conspiracy
4. Howling Rain
5. NewDawn

Nelito will win as planet.

[BloodyButcher]

1. 90% Apprime 10% Spore
2. Vikings
3. Vikings
4. CT
5. VIKIngs

[fortran]

Why is spore being so underestimated?

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

1. 90% Apprime 10% Spore
2. Vikings
3. Vikings
4. CT
5. VIKIngs

Vikings for most played race?

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by fortran

Why is spore being so underestimated?



Vikings for most played race?

I dont think saying spore will get one top10 planet is downplaying them tbh.

[Clouds]

Vikings rarely gets top planets.

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Vikings rarely gets top planets.

well thats just my assumption this round, Apprime and spore getting top planets, vikings winning it all.

[t3k]

Originally Posted by Androme2

1) Top 10 Planets - Alliance %

My prediction: 5%

Is this a troll? :-(

[Plaguuu]

Originally Posted by t3k

Is this a troll? :-(

Maybe its a vikings spy inside nd that ends up in top 10 hence the 5% on thoose 2

[Kaiba]

I actually read it at t100 not t10 that's all.

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

well thats just my assumption this round, Apprime and spore getting top planets, vikings winning it all.

What makes you think that Vikings are even playing a full tag this round?

[Mzyxptlk]

Are you saying you're not going to play with a full tag?

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Clouds

What makes you think that Vikings are even playing a full tag this round?

I did not say Vikings would be full tag did i?
Im sorry if im confusing you

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

I did not say Vikings would be full tag did i?
Im sorry if im confusing you

You are confusing me. From what I can the alliances will be exactly the same as last round, the attitude towards Vikings hasn't changed so why will they win everything? Why not ct doing a clean sweep?

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

I did not say Vikings would be full tag did i?
Im sorry if im confusing you

Your opinion of Vikings winning suggests that you think they'll be full tag, as let's be honest, anyone not close to full tag doesn't really have a chance at #1.

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Your opinion of Vikings winning suggests that you think they'll be full tag, as let's be honest, anyone not close to full tag doesn't really have a chance at #1.

Ultores won there first round with 43 members didn't they?


EDIT: Just checked they had 62, full tag was 80. So 18 less

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Kaiba

You are confusing me. From what I can the alliances will be exactly the same as last round, the attitude towards Vikings hasn't changed so why will they win everything? Why not ct doing a clean sweep?

I dont understand what you are on to now.
The other alliances dont want Vikings to win, this is a attitude thats against vikings?
Or are you talking about the attitude in Vikings wich unables them to win?

Id say that the CT def culture wich will cost them the win

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Your opinion of Vikings winning suggests that you think they'll be full tag, as let's be honest, anyone not close to full tag doesn't really have a chance at #1.

I guess time will tell eh.
From what you write i would imagine u suggest they wont be over 50

[eksero]

Originally Posted by Kaiba

Ultores won there first round with 43 members didn't they?


EDIT: Just checked they had 62, full tag was 80. So 18 less

We had 50(3 of which were added the final day) in the end, full tag was 80

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by eksero

We had 50(3 of which were added the final day) in the end, full tag was 80

Ahh yes sorry, i didnt realise you started in rd 43. I thought it as rd 44. BUt still point proven to Clouds, you won your first 2 rounds were won with 27 less and then 18 less members than full tag with the alliances in 2nd and 3rd either at full tag of 80 or withing 5 members of it.

[Mzyxptlk]

While Clouds' statement that alliances without a full tag cannot win rounds is clearly incorrect for the general case, that doesn't mean that Vikings can win a round with less than 50 players, just because Ultores (a vastly better alliance) did it.

In any case, I can't help but notice that Clouds still hasn't unequivocally stated that Vikings won't play with a full tag next round. Personally, I would be surprised to see them below 50 at tick 200, which very much puts them in the running.

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk

While Clouds' statement that alliances without a full tag cannot win rounds is clearly incorrect for the general case, that doesn't mean that Vikings can win a round with less than 50 players, just because Ultores (a vastly better alliance) did it.

In any case, I can't help but notice that Clouds still hasn't unequivocally stated that Vikings won't play with a full tag next round. Personally, I would be surprised to see them below 50 at tick 200, which very much puts them in the running.

Tbh looking in the priv chan all we need is agar3s and cha and were basically there

[Mzyxptlk]

Yeah, I know. I was hoping to catch Clouds lying outright. Thanks for ruining it, you jerk.

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk

Yeah, I know. I was hoping to catch Clouds lying outright. Thanks for ruining it, you jerk.

No I meant we have lots of ex ult players.... Jerk! I have no clue how many members we have but 40 votes have been cast on our strat poll. Looking like were going pure cr :/

[Mzyxptlk]

Yeah, I know!

[BloodyButcher]

So wich allies goes into the round holding hands?
A lot of rumours flying around about blocks allready being created to pick on the smaller alliances

[Paisley]

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

So wich allies goes into the round holding hands?
A lot of rumours flying around about blocks allready being created to pick on the smaller alliances

No Idea humour us all

[Clouds]

It's true. We're pre-blocked with Patsa.

[Kaiba]

Clouds what? I heard CT and Spore had pre round nap again but were keeping it on the down low. Spore are very much to CT what ODDR were to Apprime, flak. It's cool if that's how you wanna play, for all intents and purposes you are basically an overspill tag for CT. But now people have clicked on to that i'd imagine CT/Spore be considered one giant tag this round

[oil]

Again? I have no idea if it's true this round but if you look at the inc stats gm posted in one of the other threads you'll see 50 fleet launches from spore making it pretty clear that it wasn't the case last round.

Spore seem to have been fairly vocal in noting the reasons for why they have/have not hit certain alliances, and they've seemed like pretty straightforward justifications to me. Maybe you could articulate in a little more detail the presumably much more plausible catch all explanation; a deep seated desire to act as flak for ct.

Assuming you have uncovered the secret spore manifesto and ct/spore can now be considered one giant tag; can you offer some comments on the vikings/apprime situation. They're more powerful and their members have made more public announcements of unity that the ones you're accusing of fake pre round naps.
Who're you playing for this round btw?

[Mzyxptlk]

Originally Posted by oil

Maybe you could articulate in a little more detail the presumably much more plausible catch all explanation; a deep seated desire to act as flak for ct.

Kaiba doesn't like Forest and Butcher, and therefore Spore is a plague upon this land that must be purged by any means.

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by oil

Again? I have no idea if it's true this round but if you look at the inc stats gm posted in one of the other threads you'll see 50 fleet launches from spore making it pretty clear that it wasn't the case last round.

Spore seem to have been fairly vocal in noting the reasons for why they have/have not hit certain alliances, and they've seemed like pretty straightforward justifications to me. Maybe you could articulate in a little more detail the presumably much more plausible catch all explanation; a deep seated desire to act as flak for ct.

Assuming you have uncovered the secret spore manifesto and ct/spore can now be considered one giant tag; can you offer some comments on the vikings/apprime situation. They're more powerful and their members have made more public announcements of unity that the ones you're accusing of fake pre round naps.
Who're you playing for this round btw?

Yay i got a bite!

/me pats his trolling rod

I noticed that Spore was the alliance to attack CT the least out of all the t10 allainces, i noticed that the same was true of CT to Spore. Spore entered every war on CT's side, become the flak for them to glide to the win. Just like ODDR did for Apprime.

As for Vikings and Apprime i dont know, they have probably buddied up again but Vikings have Zwan running politics (we are going down Spores 'recruit a retard hc' strategy) so i doubt that relations with Apprime will be much, they havent been for a few rounds.

If CT need to have a 2nd tag in Spore to win PA thats fine, if it makes you feel like you have achieved something in the game then cool.

Spore are over vocal about who they havent hit and over vocal in how the have single handely down the universes politics. Seems like they are hiding some inadequices by shouting loudest.

PS. Read my sig for my allegiances

[Mzyxptlk]

Originally Posted by Kaiba

As for Vikings and Apprime i dont know, they have probably buddied up again but Vikings have Zwan running politics (we are going down Spores 'recruit a retard hc' strategy) so i doubt that relations with Apprime will be much, they havent been for a few rounds.

Zwanstic was in Apprime last round, and still has access. All of the Ultores people you took in do, as far as I know.

[edit] He was just removed.

[Androme]

We gonna win this round so feel free to forfeit already ;D

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by Forest

truth is, no-one knows the thoughts of spore hc except spore hc

And the doctors who assess you

[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by Forest

Ok I will bite.

Which war did we enter on CT's side?

The one where CT were hitting vikings and we joined in AFTER vikings hit us?
The one where ct hit apprime and we didnt break ingame nap?
The one where ct were hitting inn whilst spore were being hit by hr?
Or the one where ct/vikings were hitting fang and spore hit hr?

Please enlighten me

So you didn't go all out on Viking at round end to help CT win... That must have been a dream we all had...

[Mzyxptlk]

For someone who complained endlessly about how vocal Spore were about their politics, you sure don't seem to have managed to remember much of it.

[Nitros]

Why are you always so anti CT Kaiba? What did CT do to you in the past?

[BloodyButcher]

He is just a bitter man Nitros.
He just gotten more bitter after i told him that Vikings couldnt win last round, and he was wrong once again.
This round me and kaiba actualy agree on that Vikings will be looking to be the strongest allie

[oil]

Originally Posted by Kaiba

Yay i got a bite!

/me pats his trolling rod

/gay

Originally Posted by Kaiba

I noticed that Spore was the alliance to attack CT the least out of all the t10 allainces, i noticed that the same was true of CT to Spore. Spore entered every war on CT's side, become the flak for them to glide to the win. Just like ODDR did for Apprime.

And i was responding to your suggestion that they had a pre round nap, which the stats show to clearly be wrong. No one's denying they later formed a nap. As I said, they happen to have already discussed in public why they did so and you didn't manage to make any criticism stick last time around so i'll save regurgitating the arguments.

Originally Posted by Kaiba

As for Vikings and Apprime i dont know, they have probably buddied up again but Vikings have Zwan running politics (we are going down Spores 'recruit a retard hc' strategy) so i doubt that relations with Apprime will be much, they havent been for a few rounds.

So your response to two bigger alliances doing exactly what you're castigating two smaller alliances for doing is.... "well they got a hc i don't rate too highly so.... erm... it doesn't really count".

Could this have anything to do with the fact that you're playing for one of these alliances this round?

Originally Posted by kaiba

If CT need to have a 2nd tag in Spore to win PA thats fine, if it makes you feel like you have achieved something in the game then cool.

If vikings need to have a 2nd tag in apprime to win PA thats fine, if it makes you feel like you have achieved something in the game then cool.

Oh wait... and your help cheats too.

[Motti]

Originally Posted by oil

/gay

Oh wait... and your help cheats too.

Hey looked pal, we of Apprime have enough multis to fight solo, we dont need login details from Vikings also.

YOLO SWAG

[snoops^]

Originally Posted by oil

/gay

If vikings need to have a 2nd tag in apprime to win PA thats fine, if it makes you feel like you have achieved something in the game then cool.

Oh wait... and your help cheats too.

um you have proof of said cheating?

[oil]

You can't objectively read the edward "cba" snowden thread and call the app responses anything other than tacit admission.

[Motti]

Originally Posted by oil

You can't objectively read the edward "cba" snowden thread and call the app responses anything other than tacit admission.

You are clearly PA detective, who have found undisputable evidence! (on AD...)

[Mzyxptlk]

It is pretty ludicrous to claim Apprime did not cheat that round, Motti.

[snoops^]

Originally Posted by oil

You can't objectively read the edward "cba" snowden thread and call the app responses anything other than tacit admission.

link to thread plz?

[Mzyxptlk]

Front page: http://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=199900

[BloodyButcher]

An unexpected change of events has happened as Vikings is moving close to have a overfilled tag atm, i guess people should consider changing their predictions

[Mzyxptlk]

Unexpected my ass.