Ultores

[eksero]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Curious, since we only ever mentioned not deffing ct, what agreement were broken? Maybe Buly knows, he seems well informed?

If that was the case (I don't know the details of the agreement) then why did you (xVx) complain when the ult in 6.1 was defending the HR planet in that gal?

[DrunkenViking]

Originally Posted by eksero

If that was the case (I don't know the details of the agreement) then why did you (xVx) complain when the ult in 6.1 was defending the HR planet in that gal?

What single xVx members complain about is beyond me. I would assume maybe it was a member-response to the whine they always got from ults when deffing their galmates? I know i didnt complain. You can have Zwanstic check his logs since him and me were the ones talking politics between ult and xVx, but i'm pretty confident i didnt agree to not deffing app/dlr.

[Buly]

The best is always xVx's dumbass excuses in trying not to look like twats, which usually make them look even more dumb.

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Curious, since we only ever mentioned not deffing ct, what agreement were broken? Maybe Buly knows, he seems well informed?

Strange, considering you gave Ultores an ultimatum if they didn't recall defence from an HR planet in an Ultores fortress that you were waving.

After the above incident, xVx defended against Ultores numerous times. I suppose the agreement didn't apply to xVx.

[DrunkenViking]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Strange, considering you gave Ultores an ultimatum if they didn't recall defence from an HR planet in an Ultores fortress that you were waving.

After the above incident, xVx defended against Ultores numerous times. I suppose the agreement didn't apply to xVx.

Go check your sources Or get a source

Contradictions ftw crashface.

Oh, nm, seems i'm "discussing" with Clouds and buly, better get off AD for a while, lol.

[Kaiba]

Clouds did you BC the attack you crashed on?? confirm or deny

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Go check your sources Or get a source

For what exactly? Or is that you denying my claim?

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Contradictions ftw crashface.

I crashed some FI, who really cares? The win is already in the bag for Ultores so it's not really a big deal.

[DrunkenViking]

Originally Posted by Clouds

For what exactly? Or is that you denying my claim?

Thats me claiming that you have your facts messed up, your ability to read messed up, your ability to check with your own hc messed up, your ability to think logically messed up and your ability to keep your fleet from noobcrashing messed up.

Pretty much sums you up. You've no intention of discussing facts, like buly, hence i better just get off AD.

[Clouds]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

Thats me claiming that you have your facts messed up, your ability to read messed up, your ability to check with your own hc messed up, your ability to think logically messed up and your ability to keep your fleet from noobcrashing messed up.

Pretty much sums you up. You've no intention of discussing facts, like buly, hence i better just get off AD.

Instead of behaving like a child, why don't you elaborate on which facts were inaccurate.

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Clouds

Instead of behaving like a child, why don't you elaborate on which facts were inaccurate.

Why would he put himself and his alliance in a bad light?
Keeping the facts for himself, claiming that everyone else was wrong and they were right is the only thing he can do now for not disgracing the alliance name further.

[Buly]

So what's going on now? Who are twatting ND and what did they do to deserve this, and who are the ones keeping Ult and xVx not landing much for the past few days?

[Shev]

FaNG are hitting ND pretty hard. xVx/DLR/CT are landing a little on Ult. Ult are landing a bit on Apprime. That's why both look pretty static.

[Mzyxptlk]

Originally Posted by Shev

Ult are crashing a bit on Apprime.

[neroon]

there wasnt actually anything left to do nemore this round.. hence the setting of new standards to all kinds of different aspects of the game of planetarion

[Shev]

I didn't say they were good landings!

[Psi_K]

Originally Posted by Buly

Who are twatting ND and what did they do to deserve this

They really enjoyed sitting on their fence.

[BloodyButcher]

Originally Posted by Psi_K

They really enjoyed sitting on their fence.

Someone was drunk driving into their fence, and they fell off it
Bad politics one could say

[Wouter]

Originally Posted by Monroe

I would like to point out that in the midst of xVx's whinning that with regards to ult all that CT had really asked is that they stay out of the fight. They have somehow interpreted this as CT requested they fight ult solo, talk about trying to spin a story....

The real shame here is xVx and Ult decided before the round started to block and to attempt hide this fact until they had roided everyone else. We had xVx HC assure us during the first week of the round that they were not working with ult, meanwhile ult and xVx attacked everyone but each other. (I challenge xVx/Ult to prove me wrong here by posting how they were even close to being each other's top hostiles... here is a hint, they can't) I would like to point out that this is the first round since App won where there have been significant blocks, and this is entirely because of the intentional effort of xVx and ult. CT has consistently and intentionally avoided blocking over the last few rounds in part to keep the game interesting. Last round we spent much of the round at war with Ult (our doing not ults) while ND happily fenced to the top. When given the choice of blocking with ND and letting them walk to the win, or turning on ND, we turned on ND, not because we dislike ND, but because it was better for the game (and CTs only chance of winning ourselves) to take them on. ND fought valiantly, and in the end we both lost to a fenced Ult, but at least it made the round interesting.

Ult and xVx seem to feel it is better for the game that they block together and use xVx as a shield to get ult to it's 3rd win in a row. Good tactics by ult, for whom I have much respect for in this strategy, but a complete failure of nerve by the xVx HC, who have sacrificed any chance of their own ally win to give ult a three-peat.

Might be a late response but..
HOW THE F*CK can you be so full of yourself, your own ally made a preround block last round & started hitting ult from tick 150.

[Wouter]

Originally Posted by Assassin

Think Willzzz is correct if you read though the thread long enough you will keep seeing people reffer to us as a returning allie. So they have underestimated us

Clouds isnt even a member of fang never mind a BC. And i agree our attacking coverage hasnt bin as good as our defence, but we have still managed to take some roids from Ultores (not many but still) while xvx and ND have indeed bin hitting us tick after tick after tick for over 24 hours now with lolwaves and taken what? 200/300 roids max?

So we have made up for the 'fencing' and are now getting hit by Ultores flak, and still holding our own. Its bin a fun few days and it can only get better

another late response..
calling 100 inc fleets lolwaving is just sad :|

[Wouter]

Originally Posted by Assassin

So let me get this straight.. you (xvx) were hit by fang/ct/app blah blah blah and this 'forced' xvx to officaly nap Ultores? Give me a break thats the biggest load of bull ive ever heard.

So, xvx didnt offer a contract type agreement to the block, that if they did infact join it to hit Ultores they wanted a full round nap/reasuracne the block wouldnt turn on them? Yes or no. And if you say no then to be honest any respect i still had left for you (which isnt much) has gone as i saw the logs myself as they were taking place You didnt decline the block, you offered terms and when they were declined THEN you were hit (not even by the whole block) you officaly napped Ultores ingame. Thats what happend.

You have worked together in previous rounds (think pretty much members have already stated that on this thread already from both Ultores and xvx) You have swapped members before the round started (ie santa and many others switching) While you were first and Ultores second there was pretty much no hostility between you 2.. at all. And yet still, you come out with the same bs and try to claim the only reason you napped was due to the block hitting xvx? Without sounding disrespectful i saw for 2 days xvx and nd hit fang with as many lolwaves as they could.. and you didnt make a dent. If the block had hit xvx full force i think we would of noticed a big difference (ie you would of lost a lot) So lets get back to reality here shall we:

You have pretty much been working togther since ticks began and hitting a few random gal raids with each other in is still no excuse. You were threatend by the block with been hit if you didnt join so you panicked and offered them terms.. the block declined and 2 of the said block hit you for just 2 nights in which you then offically napped Ultores ingame. That is what happend this round.

Yet another late reply!
Dont you think its funny Ult have had avoidance with xVx/FaNG..
But also had the option to nap FaNG instead of xVx at the time the first nap accured?
You seem so up-to-date, yet you know nothing at all.

[Wouter]

Originally Posted by Reincarnate

what i am saying is xvx have helped out ult by not joining the block. now ult have napped fang meaning fang can get help to hit xvx and ult cant hit fang back. seems like a bit of a betrayal by ult.

Ult had no intention of hitting xVx, but after 8 days of incs we found it fit to let our members have some peace at mind.

PS: We would have defended xVx like they helped us out, only thing there was that HC were allowing their members to def vs Ult retalls on their top hostiles. While in return expecting to be able to roid randoms (yes HR is as good as random) in Ult forts.

[snoops^]

Originally Posted by eksero

Hey, at least i'm not a rapist!