[Zh|l]

I'm sorry. I was so wrong in assuming my alliance was being brought into disrespute when it was indicated as being 'favoured' within the rules more so than others in the original post of this very thread.

Perhaps I've got a weird seperate internet to you all - an internet run by 1up Command itself where we see obvious things the rest of you cretins can't - or perhaps you're all just a bunch of people who are arguing for the simple sake of arguing.

Tomkat referenced 1up in his initial post, he chose to bring 1up by name into the debate and since the reference puts that said alliance name into a light that I do not deem 'good', I take that as a sign of attack, through words and PR, against my alliance. If any of you want to debate that, then fine, go ahead, knock yourself out.

Posting against 1up is something I consider anti-1up and if you wish, you can switch 1up for Fury, and it's something I've done from day one on these boards - and been praised for.

Fact is simple really, it doesn't matter what anyone posts on these boards because everyone will believe what they want to believe.

This entire thing on support planets is eye roll-worthy. The rest of 1up should feel honoured, like me, that we're so worthy of attention that people have to try and exploit rules and find loopholes to beat us, rather than just meeting us one-on-one on the battlefield. Am I arrogant? Why yes, but bite me.

PS: "I got more pos rep than neg!" does not make you right. It makes you more 'popular' in saying what the masses want to hear.