Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

jerome · 4 May 2009, 08:34

the "level" of players isn't especially great but there's no need to be great. ascendancy's model allows them to be the best this current environment of pa needs to be when coupled with jbg + the 'core' who don 't give up, and some long lasting strategies eg top heavy galaxies etc. i don't think anyone genuinely thinks ascendancy now would beat the 24/7 committed ballache alliances of past, but ascendancy has never needed to be at that level of commitment. there's no need for that comparison.

of course, ascendancy is without doubt the best alliance since PAX (a different game to PA) just like fury were during PA. why? they won the most, without question. exi / 1up? yes, they were great at one point too but exi hadn't played enough, 1up lost too much.

4 May 2009, 08:34	#54
jerome . Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,382	Re: Anti Asc Allstars? the "level" of players isn't especially great but there's no need to be great. ascendancy's model allows them to be the best this current environment of pa needs to be when coupled with jbg + the 'core' who don 't give up, and some long lasting strategies eg top heavy galaxies etc. i don't think anyone genuinely thinks ascendancy now would beat the 24/7 committed ballache alliances of past, but ascendancy has never needed to be at that level of commitment. there's no need for that comparison. of course, ascendancy is without doubt the best alliance since PAX (a different game to PA) just like fury were during PA. why? they won the most, without question. exi / 1up? yes, they were great at one point too but exi hadn't played enough, 1up lost too much.