the fact CT got so much inc is partly down to shit politics on your HCs' behalf? They certainly tried to make the round very easy for themselves (eg handing out pnaps left right n centre) - so they completely and utterly failed. According to jupp (and I can fully believe it) your HCs were cocky n arrogant twats - failure again?
All a risk CT took though - in most rounds (ie, rounds where jupp isnt a hc being pestered by all the other hcs to get wars going) - ct would have won the round at a canter.
People left CT - politics again? (since it was all but effectively a bg that left you) - another complete and utter failure on your HCs' part? whether or not it be being able to control them, or recruiting in the first place.
Also, its a well known fact that on average the quality of member in ND is not as high as in CT and even urwins. You and munkee seem to be saying that that cheapens their victory??? Surely it makes it all the much more impressive...
elitism is a big problem in pa
(read: ascendancy is a big problem in pa)