Quote:
Originally Posted by [B5]Londo
Simply blaming NAPs ignores the fact that half those NAPs came about because we fought and lost.
But yes the basic issue is only Ult is aiming ftw and so has enough players to do it, end of story.
|
Yes, sure nobody managed to overtake Ult with a big margine before ND/p3ng/CT accepted NAPs with the Ult block.
P3ng had two short days as #1 before the Ult NAP commenced though.
Well surely p3ng intended to avoid being in the battle for #1, that was the whole idea of the "two tags & nap Ult the first weeks strategy" to begin with?
Maybe its just to easy being a "mid size" tags now days, thats why everyone, except maybe CT/ND, aims to be in this cathegory?
Being a "contender" requires much more effort, and usualy burns out players/HCs in those alliances.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Ult/Ast - 193m score, 73k roids, 153m value, 88 members
Norse/App/Bows - 295m score, 72k roids, 236m value, 148 members
Yup, totally outnumbered  |
Obviously i meant 1 vs 1 with the Ult tags.
Surely Ult/Ast + HR/KittenZ/ND/p3ng/CT/FAnG/VGN/s3als(the ult NAPers) out number BowS/App/Norse(the none Ult NAPers) by quite a big margine. 148 planets vs 451 planets ?