[Alki]

Originally Posted by _Kila_

I also fail to see the point many people are trying to make, as most of the ND posters here have already stated, if they attack eXil, it will be 3 on 1 and eXil will drop to #4 or maybe even #5 which will result in stagnation.
If they attack Angels again, KJ will whine about them making the war unbalanced.
If they attack 1up, they will be doing what they have so often critisized LCH for doing, this will also unbalance the war.
If they chose either of the latter two, they will either have to block with eXil or be taken out by 1up/Angels which leaves them 2 vs eXil which should go their way, leaving ND at #4, eXil at #3, and 1up/Angels at the top.
If they do nap eXi, it would be playing for #2 as they don't have the quality to outplay eXil
When they stay out of it, they get morons flaming them for it.

Why are people assuming long term relations? Why are people assuming these 'blocks' last till round end. I would honestly like to know. If the mentioned alliances have agreements and all want #1, why are these so called blocks concrete?