Thread: 1up's not-ingame members
View Single Post
Unread 20 May 2006, 10:09   #16
furball
Registered Awesome Person
 
furball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.furball has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: 1up's not-ingame members
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
So if ascendancy actually ran raids last round (Did you actually do that? I never saw any ), where none-tagged and tagged planets attacked together, you were breaking the rule, and repeatedly doing so should have led to your closure. Same for 1up this round.

Unless the rule was only applicable to planets attacking 1up, that is.
As Rob's said, the rule in its current form is untenable. It cannot continue to be enforced. If we all ignore it hopefully it'll go away.
__________________
Finally free!
furball is offline   Reply With Quote