View Single Post
Unread 12 Dec 2006, 16:41   #30
Phang
Aardvark is a funny word
 
Phang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm No Nino Rota
Posts: 5,923
Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Phang has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: The Christmas Repeal

Quote:
Originally Posted by furball
A private member's bill is one introduced by someone who isn't part of the Government (i.e. either a backbencher in the ruling party, or a member of the Opposition). If it's not supported by the Government, it very rarely gets anywhere.
'411 MPs in support' sounds like the support of 'rather a lot' of the government to me, given the Opposition was against it.


edit, besides, my chief point was that there was a 'full and proper debate', or at least a semblance of one. Anyway though; turkeys do so rarely vote for Christmas and I felt this was evident in a lot of the debate in the Lords - note that whereas the Burns report suggests licensing rather than self-regulation, the House as a whole went with the latter. Why? Because it was better for them. Unless, of course, the most significant study undertaken by the House was ill-advised in its conclusions, in which case your argument has ...problems.
__________________
Efficiency, efficiency they say
Get to know the date and tell the time of day
As the crowds begin complaining
How the Beaujolais is raining
Down on darkened meetings on the Champs Élysées

Last edited by Phang; 12 Dec 2006 at 16:51.
Phang is offline   Reply With Quote