Quote:
Originally Posted by Recluse
So you were ok with us getting blocked at around t300, you would prefer us having mass incs for 900 ticks, just to make your login-once-a-day game experience more enjoyable? How many rounds does Ult have to get wtfblocked for hundreds of ticks before you'll be ok with us having a NAP? At what point will you concede that you basically just want us to play the game for you, set up some targets, dc your inc, and set you up for an easy #3 all while congratulating you on your skillful political kingmaking? Seriously, after years of seeing you whine about everything under the sun regarding everyone elses gameplay, I think you owe us that simple concession of what you really want.
|
First of all i would love to you to kick out all the cheaters. For rounds others(not me) has been whining about zwans being a cheater, ult claimed he aint, and that there is no cheaters in Ult.
Once your HC for the last 20 years finaly gets closed, nobody knows anything about why he got closed?
You should know that how we won was always more important than winning at all for me in the past, and i would leave a winning alliance to go back to fighting for ranks again.
You arnt having "a NAP", you are having them all at the moment.
If you go into the round seeing that Ult got 100 members, while the rest is at 50, do you realy need to start the first week off by naping/making deals with another 200 planets?
If you are as strong as you are now, do you need to make it any worse with doing stuff that you can avoid like NAPing FL/HR/VGN/KittenZ/FAnG/CT/p3ng/ND and giving a safe haven for cheaters like zwans and brasil?