View Single Post
Unread 15 Apr 2017, 13:50   #113
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
Yeah, but as ive said in the past the small tag sizes makes it far too easy for mid sized alliance to aim for being a mid size alliance, and fence it to planetranks/galranks/whatever.
If the tag sizes was larger this round, maybe the gap wouldve been big enough for p3ngs to be roided/slapped around by ND/CT/BowS/App(if those 3 were all 80 members).
Wtf - if (by some miracle) those four were all 80 then they would be fighting each other not bitch slapping p3n.
You seem to miss the glaring problem with a tag size of 80; or indeed the whole tag size argument regardless of level. This round shows all to clearly that allies do not recruit to the tag limit automatically. They only do that if they are serious about winning - you cannot change the tag limit to change peoples attitude.
Even if they do have 60 they can still avoid going ftw - as app is showing by their current lazy approach resulting in crashing right left and centre. Ive had one crash on me, and two crash defending against me in in two days.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote