Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Appocomaster
This means that losing lots of fleet when attacking is less viable, and suiciding 95-100% of your fleet is far less excusable for xp reasons. Either the calc was wrong, you forgot / couldn't recall or you're donating ships  |
To elaborate on what rob said right at the end of his post concerning cathaar this system is going to be inherently biased towards cathaar and xan attacking, both of which involve landing and not losing ships due to the high firepower, low armour paradigm, and against terran with the reverse paradigm. Also how does it work for zik? Some ziks land and basically trade in a cap, so they might lose 30% of their value in their attacking fleet but cap 40%. Do they get punished for this? If it's based on a pure how much value do you have at the end is your xp going to go through the roof for landing on a shit inactive planet and capping all his ships? That at least can just be limited by putting a roof on % of ships remaining at 100.