View Single Post
Unread 23 Jul 2006, 22:14   #77
bwtmc
thinking, that's all.
 
bwtmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 867
bwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond reputebwtmc has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Double Standards

Players who do not belong to an alliance tag, or have not belonged to one for a period of time, but have had 'a lot' of interactions with an alliance in this time period can be closed for 'unfairly' affecting this 'war game.' Players who choose to play allianceless must be equipped to justify their every action in-game. If they are not, they are closed without warning or any indication in fact that they're doing anything wrong. They are of course scum, and should be persecuted mercilessly!

Great news!

We finally got our answer on the long debated issue of what's the game really about! - Alliance tags.

If you're not in one, you have no right to do anything that is perceived by the support team as having an 'unfair' influence on the game. I was under the impression it was the job of a couple thousand players to decide the reality of the game, not of a team or ten or so to engineer the evolution of the round, casually deciding what does and what does not fit in with what they construe to be a 'fair' reality.
__________________
[1up], Ascendancy Events Organiser & eXilition HC
bwtmc is offline