Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypton
I liked the last set I played of yours Patrikc, but this one just looks all over the place and goes against the general community consensus (Check PA Suggestions forum).
Have we got any alternative sets?
|
Totally agree. When many don't want forting I think it's rather retarded a set that encourage forting as much as this set does.
At least give the option of forting, xp and valueplay without forts.
I see it as kind of strange that PA-crew would chose a set like this when there seems to be many that don't want forts. Also having a set that only allowes mid+heavy to do other then xp is also idiotic. Just profit the strong alliances. Would be interesting to hear what patrikc plan was with the stats. If he wanted a fort friendly set he succeeded at least. Also ensuring that they can't get xp farmed lateround
And is something wrong with the illusion? It have to be a mistake?
And guardian T2 is more efficent then t1 ?
http://xmas.planetarion.com/statsanalysis.pl