[quote=Gate]I find this an interesting point of view.
Personally, the boundary of what is acceptable is that you do not do anything that is cheating or anything that is going to ruin the game. Within this framework I would work for the benefit and enjoyment of my alliance. planetNAPing the enemy is letting down your friends and allies, and is perfectly worth removal from the alliance IMO, in the same way as refusing to defend or attack with the alliance.
PlanetNAPing enemy planets reduces your amount of incoming and so is good for your alliance. If the other alliance HC can't prove or only put up with that, then it's their own damned fault as far as I'm concerned.
I dont totally agree with this Gatesky
, maybe a bit (a tiny tiny bit) perhaps. For example: If Alliance A & B are in war and a member of alliance A gets a planet nap with alliance B, it doesent mean that the incomings of alliance A is reducing. In contrary, the amount of incomings stays the same, alliance B just attacked another planet of alliance A. Fact is that the firepower of alliance A is reducing in this war and is an easier target for alliance B cuz most of the planets who gets a planetnap are most of the time bigger value/score planets with a bigger fleet. So imo there are no profits for an alliance to work with planetnaps (in this case), the only one who profits is the planet itself.