Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkHeart
Wish i didnt say i couldnt livelaunch at all, i said the game shifted towards later and later attacks and the prelaunch was introduced to allow those who rather get a nights kip more often than not to still attack with their ally (note im like mz in that respect, i will on occasion set my alarm, if theres an important raid or if the ally / gal is expecting big incs)
Prelaunch provides an option. Removing prelaunch provides no option until the bc's decide to bring forward attack times. As the game stands right now I for one would not play if prelaunch was removed. You for one have proved you will play with prelaunch. So in a very small sample pool of 2 then it makes no sense at all for the game to remove prelaunch and absolute sense to keep prelaunch.
Will bc's bring forward attack times if you remove prelaunch? Im doubtful solely because the shift to later launch times occured before the introduction of prelaunchs? Is what I was saying I guess so yeah i stand by my statement that until there is a dynamic in place to encourage day time attacking then pre launch is essential for the game.
|
pre- PL people attacked at a much wider timehorizon.
Cant see many quitting if PL was removed, a change in gameplay would be encouraged by most in this community. I think it would bring back more than it would make people quit.
I wont bother discussing samplings with you, as apparantly you are not very good at it!
I m certain BCs will adapt to the demands of their members. if they dont, then their alliance attacks will simply fail. Also, if they dont, join an alliance which meet your demands. Or just set a BG urself.