Thread: R61 Changes
View Single Post
Unread 25 Feb 2015, 16:26   #56
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: R61 Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
As we have allready put clear is that it will lead to less night time attacking, less mass wavings, and less incs.
Have we?
This depends on how BCs decide to set up attacks in response to the change.
Less night time incs only if alliances decide that each wave now takes up 2 ticks/3ticks/however long an attack lasts. Thus spreading out attacks.
OTOH alliances may decide that if all incs are the same ship class - alliance strategies are heading this way anyway - then its OK to allow waves to overlap. This would mean no change to the current levels of night incs.
A third option would be to start attacks earlier rather than let them go on until mid morning, arguably even worse than what we have now.
I dont see how it reduces mass waving at all, indeed it potentially makes it worse since its easier to reinforce an attack that looks like it might be going to fail.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote