Quote:
Originally Posted by All Systems Go
It was to see how big a drop in living tandards you would take, which is a very real personal sacrifice.
|
Did you actually read the post? It has been stated that in theory one can save everyone, but with external funding. I claim that if that is the case, then one would not suffer a drop in living standards, and thus there would be no dilemma.
Debating about paying $1 to save a life is stupid anyway. Totally unrealistic. Lets get back to a REAL moral dilemma: if you had to sacrifice your life in order to save 1000 other lives, would you do so? If not, how man lives would you have to save before you would sacrifice yours?