Quote:
|
Originally Posted by biffy
People were asking for it to be closed as it was degenerating into a slanging match. I've no problem with people criticising any decision I make, but they can do it without resorting to abuse of me, members of PA Team or other members of the forums.
As for my call to remove you from PA Team, I stand by that and I think the way PA Team has moved on and become a much more productive and generally nicer place to be has fully justified the decision.
|
ok i will make the argument i made in PM to you here aswell
untill now PAteam has handled Porn banners and other unwanted banners with a warning and removal and when someone got 3 warnings they would be closed on the 4th offence
you now punished someone for the same offence with closure on the first offence
if you wanne change the way you handle pornbanners, fine with me , i am totaly with you on that one, but you should in all honesty let people know you change a rule before acting on it
so this is what i would like to ask from you
reopen the offender in this case and let him play on
then anounce you are gonna crack down on galbanners that are unwanted
this would be fair!
the way you acted now is like changing the law, if you run a redlight and get 5 years in jail instead of a ticket and THEN they anounce its a new punishment your gonna object i guess.
this is the same thing
hope you see my point
on the matter of PAteam being on the right track, i dont think so but i already discussed that with kal.
i will wait for the shit to hit the fan and then we'll talk again about it