Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

booji · 9 Jan 2010, 11:40

I cant see the lack of fortress gals meaning that there will not be blocks. If an alliance is winning there is still the same incentive to team up with a few others to take it down, it may mean that it is slightly easier to do so meaning the block war does not last so long.

The one thing it will mean is that we are unlikely to see blocks against alliances that are back in 4th or 5th but who are likely to climb up. There will be more opportunity to knock them down once they reach the top so less need to attack them preemptively - not that blocks were ever very good at identifying threats before they occur anyway.

9 Jan 2010, 11:40	#5
booji a bucket Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Chatham, UK Posts: 1,073	Re: round 35 politics I cant see the lack of fortress gals meaning that there will not be blocks. If an alliance is winning there is still the same incentive to team up with a few others to take it down, it may mean that it is slightly easier to do so meaning the block war does not last so long. The one thing it will mean is that we are unlikely to see blocks against alliances that are back in 4th or 5th but who are likely to climb up. There will be more opportunity to knock them down once they reach the top so less need to attack them preemptively - not that blocks were ever very good at identifying threats before they occur anyway. __________________ Proud to have been TGV! aargh! died in Jenova! \| idled in ROCK \| disappointed in Audentes \| been Roguish \| p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin Ascendancy Otterly an Otter.