View Single Post
Unread 26 Sep 2010, 08:58   #25
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: Alliance Size for next round

Ive said this to every tag limit thread Ive seen: a very low tag limit of 30-40 will result in current alliances running two or 3 tags, and worse there would be a flagship tag and two support tags. Politics would not e more diverse for that as the HCs etc of the alliances would remain the same and they would play politics with all their tags as a unit. The larger number of tags at full size wont breed competition because the support tags would soon fall away and the splitting off of a second tag puts an even greater emphasis on good defence organisation being able to use inter-tag defence within the alliance thus helping the established alliances even more. All it does is create a discriminatory system within alliances where the less active are even more a second class citizen than they already are.
The only good possibility is that its easier to find 30 good players than 60 for setting up a new ally, but if someone wants small but 1337 they dont need a low tag size to do it.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?

Last edited by [B5]Londo; 26 Sep 2010 at 09:12.
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote