Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
I think it was some sort of a rhetorical question..
|
Indeed it was.
Seemed a little hypocritical for gm to be slating an alliance for making political arrangements that benefited them, whilst being one of the alliances with whom they'd made such an arrangement for similarly self-serving reasons.
App can't be blamed for making agreements, but when the original terms of such agreement proved to be untrue, that would have been sufficient reason to end said arrangements. It wouldn't be dishonourable to end an agreement that was made in bad faith initially. The round might have been a lot more interesting for everyone (except, possibly, Apprime) had you not held faux honour in such high regard in a web browser spreadsheet game.