Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

Tiamat101 · 5 Oct 2010, 19:09

Light the problem that is happening is that once those tag drop from ND other BG groups of good players that normally couldn't compete for #1 because of member count now can, as for those tagless ex-nders they will have no trouble finding an alliance there are tons of HC's not playing because of life or what ever reason that if asked im sure would step back into the scene. I'd also say that some of them have aspired to working with there own alliances. Its ALot easier to start a 20-40 man tag than say a 50-80 man tag. 7:1 is a good ratio for players

fficers.

But this will never happen because people like JBG, Light, Knight etc will flame about it all the time because they like there 80 man tags which stagnate rounds with 1-2 alliances being competitive. Mostly because of member counts.

5 Oct 2010, 19:09	#159
Tiamat101 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 846	Re: Alliance Size for next round Light the problem that is happening is that once those tag drop from ND other BG groups of good players that normally couldn't compete for #1 because of member count now can, as for those tagless ex-nders they will have no trouble finding an alliance there are tons of HC's not playing because of life or what ever reason that if asked im sure would step back into the scene. I'd also say that some of them have aspired to working with there own alliances. Its ALot easier to start a 20-40 man tag than say a 50-80 man tag. 7:1 is a good ratio for playersfficers. But this will never happen because people like JBG, Light, Knight etc will flame about it all the time because they like there 80 man tags which stagnate rounds with 1-2 alliances being competitive. Mostly because of member counts.