View Single Post
Unread 5 Sep 2007, 22:07   #12
Monroe
Planetarion Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,289
Monroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud ofMonroe has much to be proud of
Re: Possible effects of a shortage of etd

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
To be honest I have a feeling there's going to be an enormous amount of confirmation bias cropping up this round. Remember it's your "average" players who stick with races because they've always played them or because they like them and it's your hardcore players who'll look for their edge every time. Given the numbers it's hard to believe many hardcore players went for etd or terran.
So your saying the fact that a large number of experienced players avoided ter/etd is inherently going to make how those races do bad? If this is so, what do you feel the effects will be on any (and there are always a few) good players who chose these races for whatever reason? I would think they would have a leg up given that most people will build def fleets that are the most useful given the race distribution (anti FR/CR/CO) and this will leave an opening for BS and possibly DE to be successful simply because those that have a decent BS or DE fleet will be able to get through on most targets. Thoughts?
__________________
Romans 10:9-10

#strategy
Monroe is offline   Reply With Quote