its sort of like a choice between the lesser of two evils isnt it
In this case, i think that there should be some regulation saying that if they want to break net neutrality - they cannot do it on lines which were paid for with taxpayers money. Let them build their own if they *must* do that ( and let the market decide between paid-for, dedicated lines and free, general purpose lines ).
If they arent making enough money as it is - then increase subscription charges instead of trying to undermine the principles the internet was built on.