Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jerome
stoom made an excellent point with the whole "You're being a complete idiot Phil^ by justifying this kind of shit. It also shows how you acted as a MH if you indeed condone this shit." thing to be fair with you
|
No jer, he didnt.
Had he actually tried to read my posts with an open mind he wouldnt have come to the conclusion that im trying to justify what the mh did or did not do.
key points of what ive said, summarised :
- this thread is being used as a bandwagon for those who have an agenda to push it.
- the thread may have started with the best of intentions but cannot achieve its goal so long as recent example is cited in order to affect a change on bintaras behalf
- inconsistancies are bad
- not everyone claiming there is bias against them is correct
- there is a procedure for when there is inconsistancy with multihunters - it leads directly to the head of the department for a final say
- being closed is not the end, there is the appeal process to consider
- it is very hard to prevent those skilled at making excuses from getting away, but keep it possible for those who are genuinely innocent to prove themselves
- I dont see any evidence that bintara was picked on for who he was or what section of the community he belonged to
- rules = good, no rules = bad
- what bintara needs to do is appeal his case to fiery, not come running to the forums
- it is fierys job to manage the multihunters, not the forums