View Single Post
Unread 1 Jun 2007, 11:57   #17
Mzyxptlk
mz.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Mzyxptlk has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Rules enforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by NitinA
Those are standards set by alliance HC. If you get roided by a friendly alliance because you landed on them, it's because your alliance decided not to defend you--not you personally consenting. You have the "option" of saying FO to your alliance, and leaving.
You're disagreeing with yourself. First you say you're not responsible, because it's alliance HCs who decide if you get defended from a retal or not. Then you say it's your own fault, because if you really didn't want to get roided, you could leave your alliance, thereby implying that not doing so makes one guilty of farming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil^
The only agenda here is that carried by those people trying to 'stick it to the man', not of any genuine concern or belief that he is entirely innocent and indeed intelligent.
You're making it seem as if we have some kind of secret agenda. This thread is not about whether person X or Y is guilty or not, it's about the fact that the current rules are either hard to enforce, or are not being enforced correctly. The two examples Keiz gave are just that, examples. Therefore your comments are just useless babbeling. But feel free to discuss the conspiracy further in that other thread.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.

Last edited by Mzyxptlk; 1 Jun 2007 at 12:03.
Mzyxptlk is offline   Reply With Quote