Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

booji · 5 Apr 2016, 06:57

Tbh since the main objection to your stats Pat was that it was too fortable at the cost of allies who dont pl def all you need to do is make some ally def ships better at the same time as reducing the gal def ships. I don't think there was anyone saying the set was totally unbalanced.

p.s. are they up anywhere atm?

5 Apr 2016, 06:57	#65
booji a bucket Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Chatham, UK Posts: 1,073	Re: R67 Shipstats proposals Tbh since the main objection to your stats Pat was that it was too fortable at the cost of allies who dont pl def all you need to do is make some ally def ships better at the same time as reducing the gal def ships. I don't think there was anyone saying the set was totally unbalanced. p.s. are they up anywhere atm? __________________ Proud to have been TGV! aargh! died in Jenova! \| idled in ROCK \| disappointed in Audentes \| been Roguish \| p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin Ascendancy Otterly an Otter.