Thread: Net neutrality
View Single Post
Unread 2 Aug 2006, 20:21   #5
s|k
Caveat Lector
 
s|k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,038
s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Net neutrality
In the US, the constitution protects citizenry from the government. Government laws and regulation protect the citizen from companies. Companies cannot not impede free speech, because they do not create laws that will restrict it. If a megaphone manufacturer charges less for their megaphone + loudspeaker + soapbox setup for coporate customer than a private customer, it is not a violation of free speech rights. I don't think it would be in the interest of private property rights, and commerce, to create regulation that forces the megaphone company to charge equal prices for its megaphones and soapboxes on the basis of free speech.
__________________
Diomedes IRC
Blog
s|k is offline   Reply With Quote