Thread: Angels/NewDawn
View Single Post
Unread 2 Mar 2006, 15:24   #622
Phil^
Insomniac
 
Phil^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,583
Phil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus would
Re: Angels/NewDawn

Quote:
Originally Posted by log
[01/03-06:23:40:10] <Assassin> to me atm i see 15 members, who were all ND once before, sharing your channels, retalling on people who attack you and they attack targets you hit. To me this looks like you have bassicaly got 15 guys you couldnt fit in tag, put them into a tag and there supporting you
this one line sums his position and opinion up beyond any possible confusion. It looks like, to me, that things were indeed selectively misquoted in order to gain a political advantage.

He is letting you know as a courtesy, that to him its unacceptable. ( which is the right thing to do rather then go in all guns blazing and close a lot of people ), hes even given you specific instances of occasions its happened on so clearly he has looked into you both thoroughly
Quote:
Originally Posted by log
[02/03-06:00:26:13] <Assassin> im not claiming subh is ok
[02/03-06:00:26:22] <[ND]Spritfire> "We will allow planets to defend friends from time to time but it has to be obvious you're also playing for yourself "
[02/03-06:00:26:40] <Assassin> which is why i am pming you
* 5 lines removed
[02/03-06:00:27:50] <[ND]Spritfire> dlr defending ND or ND defending DLR ?
[02/03-06:00:27:59] <Assassin> if this isnt a regular occurence and as troll claims there isnt any interaction then fine.
[02/03-06:00:28:02] <Assassin> dlr defending nd
[02/03-06:00:28:11] <Assassin> but if there is
[02/03-06:00:28:13] <Assassin> as i said
[02/03-06:00:28:23] <Assassin> ill be forced to do somthing, if not then its all fine
hes letting you know precisely what is, and is not acceptable there
Quote:
Originally Posted by log
[02/03-06:00:34:53] <Assassin> troll seems fine with it
[02/03-06:00:34:58] <Assassin> seems to be sorted
[02/03-06:00:35:07] <[ND]Spritfire> I want proofs if you claims it
[02/03-06:00:35:12] <Assassin> and i hope you understand i have to follow up on issues btw
[02/03-06:00:35:25] <Assassin> but btw
[02/03-06:00:35:32] <[ND]Spritfire> I understand, but I also suggest that you dont listen so much to the 1up propaganda machine
[02/03-06:00:35:38] <Assassin> lol
[02/03-06:00:35:43] <Assassin> it actually wasnt from 1up
hes also letting you know why hes following up on it and speaking with you there, and from that it looks like you understand why he has to


seriously, this whole things been overhyped and misquoted for political ends
__________________
Phil^

Last edited by Phil^; 2 Mar 2006 at 15:31.
Phil^ is offline   Reply With Quote