Quote:
Originally Posted by HRH_H_Crab
In addition to the rules which you discussed before, i.e. dont have more than one planet (totally unenforceable unless you are dealing with idiots as I have stated) and don't hack the game, I would consider alliance limits to be an attempt to hardcode a limit to the number of members in a "team".
OOT def can be used as a way to circumvent that and therefore provides an unfair advantage.
|
Clearly pateam don't consider OOT def to be worth getting rid of though. Otherwise it would be hardcoded out or the rule would say "no out of tag defence" as opposed to limit the amount of times you can def out of tag.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gio2
So if everything that can be done ingame is by definition allowed and fair, why do we need MHs at all?
|
What an utterly bizzare and totally random strawman argument. Moving swiftly on...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HRH_H_Crab
For the record, I wouldn't be at all against going back to the "bad old days" of mass cheating. You may as well declare the whole thing a free for all. Allow multis and planet sharing (since really all you can do is ask people nicely not to do that), bring back in-gal and in-alliance attacking and make the ONLY rule "don't hack the game".
On one hand that would totally screw anyone that is still daft enough to take the game seriously on any level whatsoever, but on the other hand, I might sign up a planet for a laugh!
|
I don't quite know if you're serious or if you're implying this is the essence of someone else's argument or what but a) I don't remember multiing ever being allowed and b) I don't remember a deficit of "serious" players in the early rounds of pa.