Thread: The Round from CBA's perspective
View Single Post
Unread 7 May 2012, 13:08   #188
Influence
Finally retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
Influence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to beholdInfluence is a splendid one to behold
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcChas View Post
Our first NAP was never agreed to be for the whole round and it was terminated in line with the terms and conditions. Our second NAP (after CT took the lead) WAS supposed to be until the end of the round (I'm led to believe that was at FAnG's request) and had a 48 hour termination clause (although why that was thought necessary I don't know). Either way, FAnG broke it.

There is nothing wrong with my memory.
Just because you followed procedure doesn't change the fact you turned your back on FAnG when they were under fire. When you turn on a friend in need you can't honestly expect that friend not to turn on you when you are in need.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]

In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
Influence is offline   Reply With Quote