Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrikc
as been so overpowered these last few rounds.
Code:
caths @ top 100
r41 - 15 (3 top 50)
r40 - 20
r39 - 2
r38 - 11
r37 - 14 (ST)
r35 - 11 (ST)
|
Ok, everyone is always throwing around stats to prove that races were overpowered in a certain round. However, i have never seen a table where ppl take into account how many planets of each race were present.
So, here is my (more realistic) view on how powerfull races were in the last few rounds
Code:
Percentage of planets of each race ENDING in the top 100
R41 R40 R39 R38 R37 R36 R35 R34
Ter 16,3% 4,7% 7,6% 12,3% 24,6% 6,1% 7,4% 2,3%
Cat 5,0% 7,3% 0,4% 4,8% 4,3% 9,1% 3,4% 8,7%
Xan 0,7% 15,5% 5,4% 2,5% 7,5% 10,3% 4,3% 4,6%
Zik 2,8% 11,9% 13,8% 5,5% 5,6% 5,8% 21,5% 14,8%
Etd 11,1% 1,4% 13,9% 15,1% 9,2% 4,8% 4,9% 9,1%
So what does this mean?
Example:
Of all the cathaar that were present at the last tick of Round 41, 5,0% ended in top 100
Of all the eitraides that were present at the last tick of Round 41, 11,1% ended in top 100
Since (not presented in this post) 14 cathaar ended in top 100, and 15 eitraides, it would seem they were (almost) equally strong. However, relative to the amount of eitraides/cathaar in the entire universe, eitraides performed much better then cathaar (C=5%, E=11,1%), since there were many more cathaar planets, and 1 less of them ended in top 100 then eitraides planets.
Taking this a step further, we could make ratios; Define a ratio of 1.00 if a race has exactly the same % of planets in top 100 as it has % of planets in the entire universe. If the ratio is <1, the race underperformed, if the ratio >1, the race overperformed. This gives the following table
Code:
Performace ratio
R41 R40 R39 R38 R37 R36 R35 R34 Average Average2*
Ter 1,80 0,50 0,88 1,44 2,90 0,80 0,93 0,29 1,19 1,06
Cat 0,55 0,77 0,05 0,56 0,50 1,18 0,43 1,14 0,65 0,77
Xan 0,08 1,63 0,63 0,29 0,88 1,34 0,54 0,60 0,75 0,82
Zik 0,30 1,26 1,61 0,64 0,65 0,75 2,69 1,93 1,23 1,14
Etd 1,23 0,15 1,62 1,77 1,08 0,62 0,61 1,19 1,03 1,06
*) Average leaving out worst and best performance
Conclusion:
- Etd overperforms most often with 4/8 rounds
- Zik is second best with overperformance of 3/8
- Then Ter, Xan and Cat with 2/8
- If you purely look at the average performance, cathaar score worst, and zikonian scores best
- Even if you leave out best and worst rounds for each race, cathaar remains the worst race