Quote:
Originally Posted by jt25man
Yes, it would be a lot of coding, but should that really be a reason for it to be turned down without a proper discussion? I've seen a few suggestions lately turned down for the same reason "it would mean a lot of coding".
|
Not at all, I just embraced the latest reason for saying no to things
This really boils down to how you view mergers in PA. I prefer the idea of PA-Team being able to operate some kind of peer-review system to keep an eye on inexperienced alliances - that way it could make sure that they don't get taken advantage of by bigger alliances.
EDIT:
to SpookyVince's suggestion