Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Ah but they served a purpose nonetheless didn't they? If they didn't, then surely you wouldn't have had them? To be honest I doubt that claim over defending. As I recall either yourself or sid stated that 1up did not have DCs and planets organised their own defence if they could. Are you saying that none of these involved those inactive planets intag? It's really just a question of scale.
|
I can say without doubt that not a single one of the defences involved one of the inactives in tag being as none of them were in 1up channels and were told implicitly, prio to being added to tag, not to make any sort of effort with thier planet beyond logging in often enough not to get deleted.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
I agree. 1up's case is just slightly more obvious though, so I'm using that. I'm also not entirely sure if other alliances did have scanners out of tag whereas sid implicitly stated on AD that 1up, including those inactive planets, were over the tag limit.
|
It's only more obvious because you've just decided to leave scanners out of your original post. Scanners have been out of tag since they first appeared for some alliances making it a more frequent and long term affecting tactic than anything 1up did.