Quote:
Originally Posted by Yahwe
that's an interesting one.
but your argument is surely more to do with the nature of inchoate offences.
|
Well, it's not really my argument, I'm just applying
Tyrrell.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yahwe
So what about this scenario:
A & B plan together to stab C. They each buy knives and wait in ambush. They spring the ambush. In the tussle A accidentally stabs B instead of C. C escapes unharmed.
Then A is guilty of GBH on B, attempted GBH on C and conspiracy to commit GBH.
But surely B (the victim) is also guilty of attempted GBH on C and conspiracy to commit GBH?
|
Well, yes, but he's not the victim of those crimes. (And
Tyrrell specifically concerned a sexual offence, so I'm not sure whether it can just be applied across the board.)