Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
why is everyone against the best players winning?
|
"Best" is a meaningless term. Yes, some people have repeatedly won the game, given certain constraints, ie, the game mechanics. But those game mechanics may as well be arbitrary, in this context. So if they change, as they're doing now, maybe other people start performing better. Why are the current "best players" more important than those that would do best under different constraints? Why should we continue tailoring the game towards
their strengths, and not other people's? (And those are not rhetoric questions.)