Re: Round 58 BB stats discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> http://beta.planetarion.com/bcalc.pl?id=vlw4ptnh7um4c6l
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> Planetarion Battle Calc - [Defence] Value Loss (K:138 S:0) Salvage (+55.44) Lost Roids (0) Change (-82.56) - [Attack] Value Loss (K:0 S:0) XP (0/0) Change (+0)
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> lol
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> that ship is superb
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> fked up stats
[Mon 10:55] <@ChronoX> 66k value emping 820k value
|
The amazing avenger has been mentioned already and bbutcher has said that Etd is not finished... even more so against the shadow which is also not finished.
On your comment about co I was simply suggesting that perhaps other things should be changed first rather than changing everything at once and coming back to square one. In other words it is best to fix the things that are completely out of kilter at the moment such as the two ships mentioned above first and then go on to things that might simply be a little unbalanced. Once we do get on to making smaller changes my preference would not be to tone down cat co but to increase the emp resistance of the interceptor since Ter is supposed to be the race that is best against Cat.
Given that most people seem to think that this stats set favours fr/de forts if this does happen then it wont be as easy for cat co as you are implying.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
Last edited by booji; 21 Jul 2014 at 18:22.
|